SocialistAction 1983–88

The paper of the Socialist League, formerly the International Marxist Group, 1983–88

Fighting racism in NALGO

· Socialist Action No. 13, 10 June 1983 · pp. 10-11 of the scan · 805 words

The scan: 013-jun-10-1983-SA-UK.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 4-5 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 10 of the scan

THE ARTICLE by Redconference there were two One was from Liverwith their black members fighting racism in the Point (i) of the Liver"The establishment of special schemes to recruit tion and disadvantage The employer must, for normally required educait could not be said to • increased anti-imperialist sentiment in Argentina.

You are concerned about the fate of a small number of British settlers, but indifferent to the fate of the Argentinian inhabitants who were there before British colonists violated their educate black workers, as last week's article claimed.

The Ealing motion was stronger, more detailed and dealt specifically with fighting racism in the union, although it made no reference to fighting racism in the wiaer community In the opinion of many delegates this motion was also passed. However the chair ruled that it had fallen.

Delegates demanded a card vote and black cononto the Conference. floor. This was used as an excuse to prematurely close conference that afternoon leaving issues not discussed.

The two motions were workplace Newham itself.

you are for or against reaction; for or against colonialism; for or against imperialism; for or against Tascisi You cannot be for and against hatcher. It you are with Thatcher on the Malvinas then you are with her all the way -whether you like it or not you are voting for her!

Thatcher out of the Malvinas, and out of Downing Street! general world picture in which imperialism is attempting to counter insurgent peoples, who might otherwise by victorious, by the use of massive amounts of high level military hardware.

The job of solidarity movements Is to make Its deployment politically Central America is the clearest example, but the Palestinians fall within this framework too wich brings me le the question of the Syrian/Israeli war.

In spite of new Yasser Arafat and Hussein We must go back to the positions of last year that Israel had no right to invade in the first place otherwise we will be out-mandeuvred.

It is not difficult to argue this any more than to get support for Assad on the grounds that he is waveringly in support of In any case, if the war starts it will probably make little or no difference who we support.

HUGH LOWE, London W4 Write to us!

This is your page. Send us your comments, criticisms or even congratulations. But please be brief — letters over 300 words will be cut. Write to: Letters, Socialist Action, 328 Upper Street, London N1 2XP.

(Tel: 01-359 8180)

page 11 of the scan

ANDROID is set on a space station, year AD 2036. Aboard, Dr. Daniel (played by Klaus Kinski) strives to perfect his latest android — a beautiful and supposedly passive woman — Cassandra One. He is assisted in this illegal project by his previous creation, Max 404 (billed as 'himself).

Complications arise when three escaped convicts on the run from the Terrapol authorities, board the station in their damaged craft. them, Maggie, is a woman. who can therefore provide the necessary 'female electricity' to bring Cassandra to life.

From then on the plot thickens! The doctor tries to woo Maggie into taking This experiment; Max, wno overcas uic doctor's plans to 'phase him out' and replace him with Cassandra, rebels and tries to convince the convicts to help him escape; LAC convicts become reliant on Max space station to help them evade the Terrapol police.

The film is, in really funny. Max's sabotage of the doctor's attempts to 'seduce' Maggie is hysterical, as is Maggie's blunt response to the doctor's proposals.

Reviewed by Sue MacDonald But not only is the film entertaining, it also makes a ints: teren br points. When Daniel Sassandra he says, T have the finished created the prototype the perfect working class the perfect woman.

is noticeable that throughout the film 'perfect working (represented by the androids), and the 'perfect women' (Maggie Cassandra), all play consistently rebellious, and in the women's cases dominant, roles. As Cassandra says, 'We are not meant to be governed by the whims of men'. Wherever there is exploitation ana oppresSUll there is also rebellion.

But reality also raises its ugly, violent head in this sci-fi drama - Maggie's fate is hardly a sursadly, that in AD 2036 it would women are still expected to 'know their place Your average macho male space traveller doesn't take kindly to a woman telling him, I don't like my decisions made for me.

Despite some rather odd litle touches - or exCassandra One is brought to by the magic spark of sex (yawn, yawn!) - and some slow parts in the first half, this is a film really worth seeing.

Great performances by Klaus Kinski and Max 404' the scenes with some beautiful twists had me literally on the edge of my seat -then almost cheering in the aisles! Socialist Action

← Opposing the Youth Training SchemesTV CHOICE →

Something wrong on this page?