Slipman should be sacked | Socialist Action 1983

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 3-4 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 10 of the scan

port Geoff Martin's appeal to NUPE members Ior e sacking 01 sul Slipman, but I should Jike to situate it in a slightly different context.

In my belief, Slipman has jeopardised the jobs and working conditions of hundreds of workers whom she is paid by NUPE to repreHowever, I do not believe that the main issue is the granting of paid leave to campaign in the election. (My view is that NUPE, forced by legislation to grant her leave to do this dirty work, should not pay her for it). issue is that she is allowed to continue ner work as a full timer as a proof revolutionar socialists to be against bans and proscriptions from labour movement bodies.

However, NUPE full time officers are not elected by their - therefore the demand for sacking' corresponds to the campaign for 'nonas the only way rank and file NUPE members can hope to influence events Therefore, believe it is right that NUPE branches demand Slipman's sacking, on the grounds that she is attacking the rights of the members and the union she is supposed to be representing. But al NUPE branches should in this position again. Only through annual