SocialistAction 1983–88

The paper of the Socialist League, formerly the International Marxist Group, 1983–88

Voting

Socialist Action No. 161, 19 March 1987 · p. 7 of the scan · 192 words

The scan: 161-mar-19-1987-SA-UK.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 6-6 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 7 of the scan

splitting the legacy of the GLC on these issues. He has hit back through the pages of the Tribune. Livingstone support of the soft left in this fight -support which can through breaking off the soft left's bloc with the right.

The fight in the London party is therefore almost certain to spill over into a central blow up in the soft left at a national level -pursuing a quite different course, practice backing Kinnock, over fight in local government.

It is against this background that the centre spread in last week's issue of Tribune by LCC right Stanley must be understood. This artiele is both a sustained diatribe against Labour Left Liaison (LLL) and the damage it is doing to the soft left. It is worth quoting at some length, press and his column in will demand the only be given as Blunkett has been in the conterence rese recon ovurs.

winger . Nigel which they would The LLL tions, the LCC.

that week's would put the put the demands of people first, and it endorsement of the Committee and the Solid Campaign Liaison they be built.

who voted

← RealignmentEFFECT →

Something wrong on this page?