SocialistAction 1983–88

The paper of the Socialist League, formerly the International Marxist Group, 1983–88

OPEN BETHLEHEM UNIVERSITY

Socialist Action No. 176, 11 December 1987 · p. 4 of the scan · 206 words

The scan: 176-dec-11-1987-SA-UK.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 7-7 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 4 of the scan

DEMONSTRATI SDAY 26 largest group at NUS con ference aside of • Liberal Students and the Tories the most right wing on the key international issues.

The longer SSIN the 'Democratic Left' are left to battle it out between them, will become the lack activity NUS. in defence of its own students and in defence of the working class and the oppressed worldwide leadership of NUS is needed which has the political will to build a mass campaign against Education Reform Bill, in alliance with al struggle forces op. posed the Thatcher government, and in particular with the • Campaigr Group left of the Labour It needs which can defend the in terests of all its members including women black students, and which can be a truly internationalist leadership. of NUS and member of the 'Democratic Left' leadership of NOLS The mood and policy already adopted by con ference suggests that had SSiN been honest about the real reason this amendment - to oppose a broad campaign had it been opposed such, this amendment would have OCCI Over whelmingly defeated, As it is, NUS IS not now dated to work with anyone else poll stead to organise local stuagainst it, which will be ineffective.

← OPEN BETHLEHEN INIVEDCITOAbortion law: is Britain out of step? →

Something wrong on this page?