no doubt easy since Moscow did not intend aeploymenl there, but nevertheless gratuitously categorical statement.
There has been similar dissonance over foreign economic policy. Hungary has joined the IMF and is now breaking further from the ranks by trying negotiate a special trade deal with tne Market, while the Czechoslovaks trumpet the need for closer integration of Eastern Europe into Comecon.
More generally, it is evident that in place of a No the SOUrICE Jaruzelski revolution set in motion, Lilall the Kremlin was plunged into the succession crisis. Andropov's ilIness prevented the emergence of a new Soviet tor bullng the Hast European states together. AnG Lakeover is not going to resolve leadership crisis. On the contrary it may deepen it by setting off a struggle within the Kremlin.
In many ways, the governments the East European governments concerned. Firstly what sort of economic reform, if any, will emerge within the USSR? Secondly, will the USSR decide to break the economic between Eastern Europe the west Comecon response lilc War?
A radical decentralisation of economic welcomed Hungarians, by the Jaruzelski group within the Polish regime,
Socialist Action 24 February 1984 ONE EVENING in 1974 Karen Silkwood was driv-