SocialistAction 1983–88

The paper of the Socialist League, formerly the International Marxist Group, 1983–88

Newsline on Soviet Union

· Socialist Action No. 5, 16 April 1983 · p. 10 of the scan · 257 words

The scan: 005-apr-16-1983-SA-UK.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 3-4 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 10 of the scan

UNDER the headline 'The Revolutionary Way to Fight War' the Newsline, daily paper Workers Revolu. tionary directed a one and a halt page tirade Alex Mitchell against mv intormationai piece or the Group for the Establishment of Trust between the USSR and the USA (SA 25 March).

Mitchell's main thrust was that the USSR did not need a peace movement presumably because the Soviet bureaucracy is doing such a good job that any activi Campaign paign New Hope for Britain', based. upon Partv Con.

ference resolutions, will undoubtedly allace le support of millions of workers suffering under the effects of four years of Thatcherism.

Militant supports this programme will fight plemented. If wins the party ranks must see that there is no retreat under capitalist pressure.

Across the English Channe. however, France, a country automatically places on the same side as US imperialism.

I shall reply to some of the points raised because they express ideas with a certain currency on the left detence Soviet Union and our attitude the dissident movement Eastern Europe generally.

Firstly, since the rise of the Stalinist bureaucracy revolutionary have defended only the socialised property relations resulting from the October Revolution.

Secondly, the has materia! bureaucracy the defence of these relations.

Neither Socialist Action nor, for that matter the Soviet call Soviet unilateral nuclear disarmament in the face of monopoly of the forces repression the dissemination of informa. Lon these circumstances the fight for basic civil liberties takes on help the Soviet class break out of its enforced passivity.

Oxford

← Ireland and partitionWhat the left press said →

Something wrong on this page?