SocialistAction 1983–88

The paper of the Socialist League, formerly the International Marxist Group, 1983–88

Islington council breaks promises

· Socialist Action No. 64, 29 June 1984 · p. 11 of the scan · 173 words

The scan: 064-jun-29-1984-SA-UK.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 1-2 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 11 of the scan

committee (pers cap)

LAST WEEK of 400 trade unionists, parents members marched to Islington Town Hall to lobby a council meeting in support of striking nursery workers.

councillors were heckled for their attitude towards these workers. The council's embarrassment will have long term implications within local movement.

Since the strike began, the local Labour Parties have passtu reSOHI supersin But the consery the nursery WOLACN. - which prides itself on accountability — has failed to act on them.

Members of the party have been forced to publicly criticise the coun. cil, as they did at the Tues day council meeting. The Labour council has attacking this group low-paid women workers.

The dispute is now at a crucial stage — NALGO is seeking national authorisavon to bring out anouner workers on indefinite strike. t's cear that. atte weeks, the council won't move without additional industrial pressure. • Donations are needed to help keep the 18 NUPE members oul on Speakers and morewnfor mation from: 01-609 4622 (9am-Spm, Monday to Friday) 2057 (answerphone).

← NUT - escalate the actionReject low pay offer! →

Something wrong on this page?