SocialistAction 1983–88

The paper of the Socialist League, formerly the International Marxist Group, 1983–88

Loyalty

· Socialist Action No. 72, 5 October 1984 · p. 10 of the scan · 191 words

The scan: 072-oct-05-1984-SA-UK.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 6-6 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 10 of the scan

the action of people on Merseywide The other factor to consart sine wav Labour councils are seen by people. Many do not have the popularity of the GLC People have become cynical about Labour promising the denvenng very hille have reservations soon ta strategy of not setting rate. feel doesn't contal clear pore either dies deal ple, neither does with the credibility of local councils.

It seems to me totally absurd that. it we have n money to the local workforce and to run services, that we should continue to finance the City.

vur loyally is to inose who elected us, not to Having said that, think it we adopt deficit budgetting. and set a rate lilal LOCI budget, then it's clear that agreed policy: 'We will not pas either in the form of rent rate increases the people of Hackney any ac ditional grant penalty the Zovernment • Illa' Hackney.

We have reconvened a borough-wide for the end of October to discuss our tactics The group has stated its position - it's up to the local parties the say how the want us to implement this.

hoto COOKS

← RepaymentsYOU FAIL RESELECTION →

Something wrong on this page?