Labour CND March in Blackpool the unilateralist direction of the Nuclear Disarmament CND National Council to veto a composite resoluPeckham CND is extremely concerned that this year's CULference will again fail to the question of ampaigning for Britain's vithdrawal from NATO For twenty years, 'Britain out of NATO out of Britain' has been CND policy but in the last few years CND has refused to argue clearly for Today all major parties support he NATO alliance. Non-nuclear defence is leading away unilateral disarmament policy. Worse, collates membership of ing unilateralism.
Peckham wrote to all bored rone Labour CND composite for this year's conference in an anilateralist basis, CND. This will be done by essaring that the groups themselves, in 1985. The meeting, not a select few on National Council, determine the campaign's policies.
Our efforts met with a great response, and about thirty people the twenty odd groups conattended the Lacucu meeting reflecting the real concerns within the movement eralism must remain the basic goal and Wass call' paigning the basic method of achieving it.
(Peckham CND)
It was clear from the weekend's meeting that part of the problem to be 1AC < en is of withdrawal from campaigning agenda means that national decisions, which represent the democratic expression of CND activists, have been ignored. The Labour CND composite was excuucu ube! Where Oct. 22
----- pull-quotes -----
CND ACTIVISTS from many local groups met at County Hall last Saturday to discuss how to defend
organised by Peckham CND, resulted from a deci- sion by the Conference Arrangements Committee of
tion from over 20 groups which called for defending unilateralism, dropping any thoughts of a freeze, and increasing our anti-NATO profile.
attempt to organise to defend the
NORTH WESTERN AREA PRIDE OF GOLBORNE BRANCH