SocialistAction 1983–88

The paper of the Socialist League, formerly the International Marxist Group, 1983–88

Socialist Action No. 113, 13 September 1985

Socialist Action · 13 September 1985 · 12 pages, 17,700 words read by machine

The scan: 113-sep-13-1985-SA-UK.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive)

Uncorrected machine reading of the whole issue. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from the scan and has not been corrected or cut into articles. Each page gives the headlines first, then the columns in order, so one article runs on into the next. Expect misread words. Use it to find things; quote from the scan.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Page 1 scan of this page

ACTION Labour must defendI black youth BURNED TO

THE SPECTRE of inner-city revolts returned to Britain's streets this week. Four years after rioting' swept areas like Brixton and Toxteth, the youth of Handsworth, Birmingham, let the world know that Thatcher's Britain still offered them no future.

In a night of revolts in the Lozells Road area of the city they fought street battles with the police, erected barricades, sacked shops and banks, and nurned •ComicCid premises The catalyst for this, ad. the

cording 'official sources', was 'minor'. row between a policeman

ticket issued for illegal parking and no displayed tax disc.

But every other party

police brutality.

CILCS Eyewitnesses state that

when black criticised police handling

SuIC was knocked to the ground and kicked by one of the police involved.

This was just one provocation too many. Within two hours hundreds of youth 0.2101 gathered at the scene. disused bingo hall was set on fire.

Firefighters trying to extinguish the blaze were mel with Stores and police reinforcements were

Forced down Lozells Road, youth turned their anger on the commercial buildings lining it and overturned cars to restrict police pursuit.

By the morning the area was reminiscent Belfast. Thick smoke col-

gulled buildings, glass and bricks covered the and there millions of pounds worth of damage.

the aftermath of and these CYCHILS politicians alike have rushed to offer explanations Tor what occurree and to reassure property-owners

CHICCUNC DIOLCCHIOR. Afro-Caribbean youth are

being targetted arcady with references to drug

*barbarous criminality, and claims of pusners

animosity between them and the Asian community.

Keterences to the "volatile racial mix' of the area begin to suggest that intger-racial conflict is inevitable. In reality all sections of the community

thatg Afro-Caribbean, Asian, and

were involved in many incidents. Far from

divided, they are Denne united by mounting unemployment and growing deprivation in SUIC city's inner area.

An eyewitness report from Mick Archer

Lozells Road divides the Birmingham wards of Handsworth and Aston, which in January of this year had 30.4 percent and

40.3 per cent unemploy-

respectively.

Amongst youth, the figures are far worse, with many nack youngsters never having had a job.

That, HOOTE ally 'minor' incident, lies at the root of these events.

But this indefinite

gravated by the deepening

poverty of many of these

areas. According to the city council itself 49 per cent

of its *core areas,

populated by 270,000 peo-

ple, is in the most deprived

two and a half percent oi

England and Wales.

It is these problems that 3LaDOU

have to provide answers

the

first response local Labour MP Jeff Rooker rocked many black voters.

He went on breakfast

TV to describe the events.

SOCiAliSt

of Monday as 'a barbarous act of criminality, and to aclena une neavy poncing of the area and ask for more of it This type of response is a disgrace to the labour movement.

Black people require not more racist policing,

movement which attacks institutional

the ponce harassment of black youth. But in a direci

PAGE SEVEN

sense, Rooker's a response is also against the most immediate interests of the defence of THe aboul movement as a whole

The enormous scale of the deployment of riot police and techniques munities Brixton and Handsworth during year of the miners strike showed one thing clearly: the labour movement ig-

The LONDON

DEATH C

nores the repression of black people at its own peril.

Instead of joining in the hysteria of the press and the Tories, the labour movement must come to the defence of the youth of

against the vilification and repression they are now confronted with. Only when the labour movement has the courage stand

Unemployed and strikers

Inside:

TUC congress

1985-pages 2-5

South Africa-pages 6-7

STA

h BLAZES

STANDARI

Brothers beaten by rio

killed in petrol bomb atta

against such campaigns. and show that it stands the black munities against racism, will it be able not only to build an alliance with the black communities of Britain but also to defend itself.

Clare Short, Labour MP for 1C 21008H 2 Ladywood, told Socialist Action: This time police pressure seems

No. 113 13 September 1985 30p

10p

Evening News

NIGHT OF

VIOLENCE

to have been the spark, but and storetout hope the tinder is unemploy ment, racism,

tackle those issues then we will see this

again and further tragic

losso is the "barbarous

criminality' of this govern ment's policies that needs

tackled, and al labour politicians should remember that.

Page 2 scan of this page

TUC Congress 1985 ... TUC Congre

"The fight to save the NUM is your fight'

2

SociAlist

ACTiON

Duffy, Thatcher

and Owen

LAST WEEK's TUC revealed a fundamental part of the forces which are reshaping British pol which the headlines were dominated by the two extremes of the labour movement - the AUEW threatening a split of the TUC and the victory of Scarglil in the vote on the miners.

Of course these two wings totally different relation AUEW's course In reality commands large support in the TUC - perhaps one third when the final crunch comes.

Scargill's course Is supported by minority. The contre although squeezed, jority - although this contre is progressive. ly shifting towards acceptance of the anti-union laws.

But while the TUC Is most unlikely to split

the short term politics

Thatche in popula to maintai

the

the pol

пот of the anti-trade legislation Is, after all, policies and measures the AUEW and EETPU right wing carried out for yoars. This is why,

moving there is a real clash with the AUEW-EETPU. The majority TuG framework of the Tory laws by struggle but by a future Labour government. The AUEW-EEPȚU would not.

The problem for the that their course is incoherent and without

of success.

Labour government that will qualitatively

reverse Thatcher's anti-union

Kinnock has already made that clear. And,

with the strength of the Alliance, oven Kin-

nock's ability to Introduce his much mooted

'Bill of Rights'

siderable doubt.

The only logical and coherent courses be-

ing pursued are those of the AUEW-EETPU,

to accept the

laws, and the NUM's, which is to fight them

now through struggle.

the majority, it has no firm base on which it

rests

only be slowly eroded.

their very different strengths,

dominated the Blackpool headlines and why

they will continue to do so.

Ronald Reagan's much-quoted quip that

'you ain't seen

vides a key — to both the left and the much.

stronger right wing of the trade union move!

mont. The polarisations that will shake the

British trade union and labour movement are

still oaly just beginning to gather their full

Socialist Action 13 September 1985 tics. It was a congress in

were in a of The

Outside the NUM, a small ground of the TUC, still commands the ma-

and Thatcher's the

preventing

bulld-

for of British enged. They are aimed challenge from Labour on

the trade union bureaucracy

or is required. The entire

on solidariintalned In ust be intors in

JEW and the essential features union legislation. That modelled on the

fact that the general councii is to accept the Tory framework of law,

TUC would like the removed - not

general council is

There will not be

legislation.

the unions in con-

essential framework of the

While the 'centre' is

- although of courso Its support will

That is why, with the extremes in

nothing yet' for

THIS YEAR'S TUC congress was one dominated by its extremes. It was clearer than ever proof that Thatcher is increasing excluding any 'middle way' in the fight against her government's attacks on the Labour movement.

On the one hand, Gavin Laird and Eric Hammond threatened to split the trade union movement from top to bottom with their decision to break the Wembley special conference policy of non-compliance with Thatcher's anti-union laws. And Wednesday saw the capitulation of the general council in the face of such threats.

On the other hand, the NUM resolution, carried against the wishes of the TUC leadership, reflected the pressure of support for a real fight against the Tories that still exists within sections of the trade union movement.

Arthur Scargill's speech to a Labour Herald fringe meeting outlined the bankruptcy of a 'wait for a Labour government and see' approach. He spelled out in detail the way in which all the arms of the state had been used against the miners during their strike — and therefore the full implications for the unions of capitulation to the Tories laws.

The general council's surrender to the AUEW decision to ballot its members on whether to accept government money for ballots revealed the hopelessness of the TUC's so-called centre's position opening the door to further climb-downs by the general council.

The national leadership of the NUM is today the only leadership of a major union supporting determined and uncompromising resistance to the attacks from the

CAROL TURNER reports from Blackpool.

SPEAKING AT a Labour Herald fringe meeting at the

end of Tuesday's

SCARGILL explained the full extent to which Tory

anti-union laws had

mineworkers' union. He said:

PEOPLE TODAY were

talking about the decision of

congress. What was it, they

said that made delegates

their minds?

Because the predictions of

the media had been that we

woula lose wilen it cane lo

the vote at the end of the

dealer

believe that the

delegates at the congress to-

day took into account that

our people have suffered in

an unparalleled way at the

nanes one stale

They recall that there

were 60 of our members still

prison. They recognise

that nearly 700 of our peo-

ple are still sacked as a result

of the crime that they have

been fighting for the right to

retain theit job. They

science do more than give

support to policies which we

had taken up on behalf of

the entire labour and trade

union movement.

were some wau suggested that to ask for a review of cases of those still in prison would either DATES the DOUI Party and cause an electoral problem, or certainly create difficulties because we were challenging the judicial system.

People who suggest these things must be joking. Anyone who went to the Orgreave trials has seen a demonstration of corruption the like of which haven't seen British courts for half a century.

We had police officers who took the witness box who were accused of forging film produced which showed that the film you saw on BBC had been changed round to convey a different picture. And we had officer after officer coming to ad-

Unexpected support

for the miners

DECORATED IN a tasteful two-tone grey with a discreet burnt orange stripe, the Blackpool's legend 'you do not stand alone'. Put there in support of GCHQ workers, the subject of congress's first debate, the slogan had been replaced by Tuesday. As far as the general council was concerned, it certainly didn't apply to the miners.

Moving NUM comDosILe Arthur Scargill stressed the support pledged

vear's congress and the need to continue it while the attacks on the went on unabated. It wasn't just the Coal Board who were opposing the miners, said Scargill, but the whole

and its intention was to destroy the entire structure of the trade union movement.

Recalling the 1984 congress decision, and recognis ing the importance of the miners" strike, une tion called on: 'the TUC to immediately campaign and the next Labour government to legislate to provide • 'a complete review of all cases of miners jailed as a result of the dispute. • 'reinstatement of miners sacked for activities arising out of the dispute.

• 'reimbursement the National of Mineworkers and all other unions with all monies confiscated as a result of fines, sequestration and receivership, and

*the ending of all pit closures other • than hv exnaustion. saving jobs and communities and sateguarding the publicly owned coal

Arthur Scargill being arrested at Orgreave

mit that he wasn't telling the

truth.

Our lads were on trial,

charged with riot and facing

a life sentence. They were

facing court

already heard Leon Brittan

the then-Home Secretary,

TUC platform in Winter Gardens on Monday bore the

industry the basis of

Britain's niceling needs.

To those claiming that the four principles contained in

spots be reced a r

The replied: resolution not passed, then will represent liability to the whole trade union movement. because the miners will feel deserted by the TUC and its affiliates. '

Backfire

Opposing the composite on behalf of the general council, Norman achieved his most incompe-

penollance week. "There are some

that Culli Cou will want to do, there are some things they must do, began. *First to honour the miners and their families engaged that dispute, that great human effort that lasted for that long year ... drone, drone.

Tale reached the point: 'Composite 19 goes so much fur ther, too far. And I regret the unsupportable demands that have been posed to us. The key point, he stressed,

say that offences of this

kind carry up life im

prisonment. It was no joke

for members of my union to

stand in tnat court room and

have to listen to fabricated

evidence. The police lied in

that court room.

When people talk to me

News

was that dealing with reim-

lost through fines and sequestra tion.

A jeer went up when one of his 'appeals' backfired: *What about fines dividuals? he asked 'A we to say that individuals

lost their all, whatever it was. are to be

in the cold financially whilst repaid UnIOnS are to get

Unions couldn't claim 'special status without damaging Labour's chances he tried to explain. "Get off, your knees,' heckled a striking miner in the balcony

cern doesn't my job back,' came the quick reply The exchange encapsulated the debate

When the composite was won on a hand vote miners and their supporters in the galleries rushed forward. Few imagined the card vote: sim majority or 64,000, would win too.

it did

Afterwards delegates and visitors discussed result. The banking and finance union (BIFTU) had. abstained; had the teachers. But the last minute decision of ASTMS

support the composite had swung the result

Despite the decided shift to the right of congress as a whole, the debate showed that substantial support for the miners' and their leadership still exists across

about enquiries ther

should be

about what happener

polic

Orgreave, about

violence on miners whe

were fighting for their jobs

My union has been thi

subject of an attack the lik

of which has never been see

Page 3 scan of this page

's 1985 ... TUC Congress 1985 ... Stitch up at Blackpool

Neur's

the reality of the congress itself was very different.

resolutions and ammendments

There was no crisis atmosphere whatever.

being stitched up.

cil and the AUEW executive.

1985, Blackpool. trast between hanger presentation by the media and the reality of the sessions in the north west's most famous holiday resort couldn't have been starker.

While Newsnight's Vincent Hanna agonised in the

yer of the Imperial Hot

nd breakfast TV crew lurk TUC delegres dozed congress corridors,

unconcerned in their red-plush history. Britain's union

had vul funds We've

SLIIKC for six

take the

argue that vote

years and had

The not only listened to

also linked national

rules in constitution which had

That final judgement, he hadn't heard the case for and against: it was an interim judgement designed to destroy the national union's case and to undermine the strike itself.

When the union by a democratic deicision refused to describe the strike as unofficial, because was Lies rule and constitution, it was declared that the union was in contempt, and the funds of the union were questrated.

THE MEDIA presentation of the TUC congress was dominated by the 'drama' of the threat of a split with the AUEW that was being played out at Blackpool. But

During the half day of debate — with dozens of

devoted to Thatcher's anti-trade union legislation there was no serious discussion, not even a direct mention in fact, of the possibility of a break with the AUEW and EEPTU.

From the outset it was clear a deal between the general council and the electricians and engineers was

CAROL TURNER looks at the events at Blackpool and contrasts the drama reported in the media to the real situation at the congress — and at the nature of the final deal between the general coun-

seats or sipped undrinkable tea in Winter Gardens cafes.

General secretaries glimpsed in fervent huddles outside the auditorium were more likely to be discussing how to hide their sell-out oi the Wembley conference decisions than what stage the negotiations were at. The bust-up with the new Icalsls was slage-llanagco by the general council from the start to finish in Darl to cloak the clear step away They came in, the sequestrators, and they seiz. ed our bank account - all

10 pebank they sid

"Where's it bank men ere said: "I don't know.'

They (the union funds) after about Not because they were brilliant detectives, but because the international banking system volunteered information as to where our money was. pound to a penny that it I'm willing to bet we a nave been a gangsie. . in New York could have deposited anywhere and nobody would have found it. But the national union's money Iney revealca Instantly.

We applied to get our from Luxembourg, Dublin, the Isle of Man, Zurich. They (the sequestors) lost in every inWe haven't won a and we Loult case lcie haven't lost one there.

So a new tactic had to be found. We suddenly found that there was an application Heathfield, McGahey and LU sack

Scargill as trustees of the miners' union, because we'd acted irresponsibly in laking an e members' money away and investig I alival 'hev had put the money at risk.

Well, PIl tell you what we'd done. We'd put it so much at risk that we got 22 per cent interest rate in-

from the 1982 special conthe te de antonion pass

the

that this congress was tak-

ing.

The first debate of con-

gress set the scene for the

events to come. The rest of

the week proceeded accor-

ding to plan — the only hic

cup an unwanted vote of

support for the miners.

A written supplement to

the annua report brought

delegates up to date with

developments Concer

the Angreat the be ming

finance and general pur-

poses (FGP committee had

met the AUEW on 7 August

and concluded that the

engineers' actions were

'contrary to the declared

policy of congress'. The

general council subsequent-

ly adopted the FGP report

and, after a further meeting

WELD Lne AUEW

stead of nine. I ought to be on the honours list!

They took into court. Our barrister said: *Just say that you'll not move the money if they'll i1UL receiver.' Well that seemed fair to me - if we'd have

red it they'd have seiz.ed it. So we agreed, and the other side agreed.

We weni back into court tor

declare to at hed age to

declare that what the two parties had said. At the back of the

'The Orgreave trial was a demonstration of

corruption the like of which we haven't seen

for half a century'

courtroom a bloke in a wig

said: 'I'm here from the se questrators. And the judge said: 'Well I'm not

supposed to hear you but 1

He listened to this fella for aboul an nour and a half, then he said: 'I agree with you.' And he sacked McGahey, and he sacked Heathfield, and he sacked Ille The judge appointed a

Tory Party member as the seme four weeks who some later. Then they appointed

receiver called Michael Arnold, who has SHICC the NUM that time said he's

There's an ironic twist to this story, because in

August, directed them

'discontinue such activities

forthwith and undertake

not to engage therein it the

future'

While congress awaited

Gavin Laird's reply, Ron

Todd moved composite 2.

This formally reaffirmed

the Wembley conference's

total opposition to the

Tory anti-union • laws, allo

called on all affiliates not to

cooperate with, and a future

Labour Repeals the 19 and

1980 and '82

Employment Acts and the

1984 Trade Union Act.

"This composite motion

concerns the impor

tant issue we have faced in

many years,' said Todd 'At

its heart is a question of the

fundamental credibility of

British trade union

movement with the

public, with the employers,

and above all with this bitter

and hostile government...

June 1984 I was a trustee of the miners' union and I was also a trustee of the mineworkers' pension scheme. the minerworkers' pension scheme we've got a bit of money: f6 thousand million.

Everything had gone

on fine for • years • fill I

I said: "Where desments ha they we in-

said: 'Well, they're invested properiy. I said: 'I want to know where. And 1 stopped the

Along Pete Heathfield Mick McGahey, challenged

And for challenging

you what that charge

in the of sour

tomorrow.

We've. got the receiver. had no

September We've

with our printers,

'What we were saying at

Wembley, in non-

cooperation stand, , was that

we should not and would

not seek to do the Tory

government's job by putting

the legal frighteners on our

members as we pursued the

everyday process ; of collec.

tive bargaining.' It was from

this 'essential principle' that

encoronene NO EU

sacrifice our basic economic

independence

equivalent of a penny on

members' subs'

But when it came Alitaling Graham

Alistair

CPSA declared himself

favour of a 'slightly dif-

ferent emphasis'.

be foolhardy for Labour to

accoun

anti-trade union legislation,

ne sala. , some parts were

already popular with trade

union members. The issue

colleagues and friends we couldn't bring out newspapers or leaflets, we couldn't pay staff, we couldn't pay our rent or do anything.

Our union is facing a fight. We're fighting to sustain ourselves, and the labour and trade union movernent's got to understand what's at stake. Out union's been hijacked, it's been laken over Dy ine state

Don': start talking to me about what happens in Poland, or Chile, Bolivia - you've only got

look here in Britain where the union officials have been removed as trustees for carrying out the wishes their members. We were elected Dy lw per cent of our members as trustees of the

we've been kicked out by one unelected judge

We're facing desperate problems, in terms of our financial future. We'll survive somehow even if it comes to the stage where no staff wages can be paid

• and by the way me and Heathfield still aren't getting paid. But the most important thing to remember is that there's got to be a response from this moveWICHL.

The fight to save and sustain the NUM is you fight. Because to the extent that we're successfu in fighting the policies of the Board and the government, to that extent your causes are also successful.

Socialist Acti

was that ballots had to take

place in a 'more neutral' at-

mosphere.

Thus the supposed unity

around the Wembley deci-

sions, and against the ac-

tions of the AUEW, choked

at its first breath. Far from

the differences with the new

realist right being a question

of 'essential principle', they

were shown to be a matter of

tactical degree and speed of

development.

When Eric Hammond of

the electricians' union took

the rostrum to oppose the

composite, car-

ried such arguments to their

logical CONCLUSI The

Trade Union Act was 'nudg

ing' unions into changing

their practices, he declared.

The 'flexible attitude' of the

EEPTU was serving its

members better than

Wembley package The 'Wembley days' had passed with the failure to elect a

Labour government in 1983.

Why penalise the engineers

or the electricians for being the first to recognise that

After all the general council itself was going down the

same path.

Ken Cameron's speech on the right to strike spelled

out the real meaning of Tory laws. Mions railwaysist com munications

essential services precluded from striking was potential ly endless, he pointed out.

'And that's what Eric Ham

aled rad orion legist ion, repld is asking us to ac-

But if any delegate in the hall was unclear on the posi

Norman sens alt her

Norman put then right. Echoing his we can't

do without the electricians or the engineers' Monday speech, he said

not departing

from Wembley. Thai would

be giving a signal that we are packing up our policy of op position. But nor are we being daft and embarking on a colnsion course or de fiance which would result in ucoverale Isses. LISTE the TUC was not going to fight the anti-union legislation now, when it counts.

By Wednesday night the general council had cepted that the AUEW would ballot its members before taking more government money. Media pundits and general secretaries alike halled the decision as a crisis averted at the eleventh hour But the debate had shown

the go esse

essential points of principle separated the general council from the AUEW executive. It is this which is creating the rea problems IOr the trade union movement. i ne stakes that led the special

conferey to de the a polay

non-cooperation Thatcher's anti-union legislation are just as high in 1985. That has already been shown by the NGA dispute by GCHQ, and finally and conclusively by the full weight of legal attacks the NUM during the strike.

There is no possibility

lat the paper-tiger unity

is year's TUC will fright a determined Tory government into backing down,

TUC Congres!

the openly

laborationist policies of the

American-style unionism

Thatcher would have others

•emulate. The outcome of

this year's TUC will en.

courage,

courts from further attacks on the unions.

By refusing to support the miners during then

1984-85 strike, the general

its unwillingness to fight the

LONe acquiesing

presenting the AUEW's

Droposed balot as a com

promise' it is demonstrating

much CLIC

prepared to shed the fig-leaf

of the Wembley decisions

In reality the general council

at its own pace, is preparing its own path for acceptance

of the anti-union laws.

The for the proDiel trade union movement, and the general council, is that

issue cannot be one the anti-union laws. The Tories

arena to a real-life fight

The onlv wav to comba the Tory attempts to pull the teeth of the trade union movement is to stand and

fight now in the struggle that will continue to take place long before the general election.

That means fighting every as it place, fighting to win the Labour Party support that struggle, and demanding an in-coming Labour government throws out the whole parcel of Tory anti-trade union legislation. A

for fighting the

cher.

what most union

fier rhetoric amount

can hide the

anti-union The

union forward a

split with the AUEW

No has been the TUC

engineers accep

Instead union

money.

What is needed is TUC

be the council preparing own climb.

union laws.

Page 4 scan of this page

24 hour action for GCHQ

4 Bernard Reagan

An old

'WE MUST be honest about what we can and cannot do. We must promise what we can deliver. We must not promise more than we can deliver, and we must deliver what we promise.' So said Norman Willis introducing the joint economic policy statement to this year's TUC congress.

mise nothing at all, Mr Willis was onto a winning bet at last.

New Britain is a masterpiece of empty retoric.

That is DOL say, however, that the document is devoid oi content On the contrary, fitting ticle world be an

*An Old Partnership, An Old Britain', IOr ILS intention rather openly is to lay the groundwork for comes policy and the return to a Lal bour government of the WilsonCallaghan type. The entire structure is there.

The partnership document promises a national economic summit', bet-

Cill ployers and the unions: an 'integral part of our policy for extending industrial democracy and planning' in the task of getting 'our

people back to work'. The

Willis TUC speech «ll-

Socialist Action 13 September 1985 CONGRESS '85 had none of the atmosphere of Brighton 1984. Last year's congress took place in the midst of the miners' strike. from day one, with young miners and women from the support groups.

The air was electric all week. Everyone who addressed congress knew that they were being measured against the fighting determination the NUM

and file and its leadership.'

In contrast, this year there were few occasions when the conference actually Cante ave. were standing ovations for Line workers and the teachers fighting for Inel pay claim. But in the main speakers were long

economic

partnership

TUC-Labour Party

In supporting a statement that managed to pro-

For the misnamed A New Partnership, A

phasised the 'f50 billion spent abroad since 1979 -twice as much as manufacturing investment in this county the same period'. t was al shades of George Brown's 'National Plan' of 1964.

Wilson

Despite congress speeches deploring any hint incomes policy, what is clear is that the

partnership' is not one of the working class against capital, but a tripartite deal

Labour fingers will remain crossed that the old trigger

of 'increased demand' will

of GCHQ * UNIO

SER

This conference and last

The hall was packed,

on rhetoric, and there was no sense of the trade union

up to organise for struggle.

Ăs Sylvia Burton, chair of Addenbrookes Hospital strike committee the Labour Herald fringe meeting: class can't turn to the TUC

then wiere car they go?

Like numerous other strikers lobbying congress

Night R

Sient Norwood Junction NUR Tos ale celes

Neither the leadership of the TUC 1IUl the Labour Party have learned anything from the lessons of the Wilson years. Nor do they avul criale the changed situation in the 1980s.

The motive force Thatcher's attacks on the

movement is precisely because emplovers are no longer prepared maintain anything like full employment • a lact Laciliy aumitted in the partnership

This statement shows how the Labour

ICAl government will reduce unemployment and get to grips with Britain's longterm industrial weakness. And it reaffirms our com-

full employment."

But it proposes precise-

Even previous pledges are largely abscill

As with the debate on the anti-union laws. so too the economic policies adopted by this year's con-

represent a sharp

hift rightward

NOS LIM

guards, Barking Hospital workers — they hardly got a mention. But one group of workers who did receive a warm welcome were ine Dunne's from

who have been on Dublin, strike for 11 months after their refusa] handle South African goods

Whilst it was true that the oi the borearay water miere still aged males, was much in evidence it was also clear that the inspiration of the miners' strike is very much hands on tve NUM motion The vote by show of revealed a massive majonty in support.

It was only when the

DESPITE SOME ring-

ing rhetoric, no clear strategy emerged to combat the Tory attack

on trade union rights at

GCHQ, during the first

debate of the 1985 TUC congress in Blackpool.

Rather it was a stage-

managed affair, a display

of amour propre between

the general council and the

new realist splitters acted

out between Norman

Willis and Eric Ham-

mond.

Civil servants from

Cheltenham were

Distors galey, e heir bane- pride

ners festooning the

balcony during the debate,

as one general secretary

after another took the

card vote was taken, following the demands of right wing CPSA president Kale Losinska, margin became so narrow.

least one delegation, with over half a million

By Bernard Regan, NUT delegate (personal capacity)

votes, cast their card vote against the NUM without a delegation meeting.

Inod discuseation

we did discuss

delegates, Socialist Teachers Alliance supporters and others, rostrum to pledge their

Movine recono n 20, John Sheldon of the Civil Service Union pointed out that disciplinary action against GCHO union members was imminent. am therefore calling upon the movement,' he said, "to act on its previous pledges: that if our members are dismissed they Will lake accion in their support.

Pledge

The pledge rellan. that of last year's con-

gress, to call a day of ac-

tion coordinated through

the Council of Civil Service Upions.

'Support those people,

moved backing for the motion. This was defeated because of oppositor from the Broad Alliance, i grouping that includes

of the Communist Party dees nave since the NUT does a clear policy calling on the TUC to campaign for amnesty the delegation was obliged

the advice general secretary Fred Jar vis to oppose the motion Instead there was an over whelming vote to abstain.

The miners VOLE reflects the impact of the strike amongst and the radicalisation that

going inside the union in the course of our support the resolution, demanded NUPE's Rodney Bickerstatt. 'And if

Thatcher dares to move against one of them, let's make sure that the day of action is massive industrial action the like of this government has never seen before.

But with no plan

beyond a 24

page Bickerstaffe's

speech is likely to stay only

at the level of fine words.

the exchange

between TUC general

Norman Willis

and the electricians' leader

Eric Hammond that pro-

pose of this opening

debate. Promising a ballol

to call out the power

workers for a one-day ac-

tion in support of GCHQ,

News

current pay fight

What typified the character of the congress was the fact that the whole question of the AUEW acceptance of governmen money for balloting never debated by delegates. Instead, it was the trade union bureaucrats who stitched up the dea behind the closed doors of the Imperial Hotel.

Blackpool 85 was undoubtedly a ster backwards. the vote on the NUM motion reflects the fact that there remains a fighting determination inside the working class We will have to look elsewhere than the TUC for leadership however. Hammond becan: n proud to be _responsible for this contribution, it'|] probably be my last one.' Welcoming the promise of support from the electri cians, Willis said in his

"If this battle is to be won, Eric,

need the electricians and the engineers in this EL COS The beginning of con-

gress was a set-piece show of unity. Unity of course, is necessary in the face of a threatened split trade union movement.

media dramatics aside, there should be no doubt that the terms were those AUEW and the EBPTU. ancialen

Eric Hammond called the tune and Norman Willis dutifully piped

Page 5 scan of this page

News

is 1985...

photo: JOHN CHAPMAN

THERE WAS no compromise reached at Blackpool last week.

Gavin Laird delivered a diplomatic speech in which he claimed there were no victors. But the settlement reached between the AUEW executive and the TUC general council over the acceptance of government cash for union ballots was entirely on the terms laid down by the engineering union leaders.

This is made perfectly clear in the letter sent by

AUEW general secretary to Norman Willis on 4 September - that is, the third day of congress

which formed the basis of the 'deal'. It says: 'the executive council of the AUEW are bound by the decisions tional committee.

Contrary the impression by the media, it was the union's national committee which had decided back in May LILa the AUEW should reballot on this question, not the TUC general coun-

cil. Had the TUC suspend-

OUR paper is needed.

Our paper is apprecia-

ted. Our paper is uni-

This was the ver-

dict of Socialist Action

supporters in the engin-

eering and rail 'In-

dustries who met over

last weekend.

Engineering comrades

pledged $240 there and

to the paper's

fighting fund.

workers donated £125.

Peter Heathfield, eneral secretary of the UM told our sellers at the Women against Pit Closures conference that ne took socials ¿culon becanse 'It had not opportunistically dropped the miners case like so many other left papers .

Our coverage in defencr of the NUM has been se cond to none.

Nowhere else is it possible to get the grouments and intormation on the struggle in

AUEW forces TUC climb down

There should be no doubt about this.

chen expellot and the

ballot and the current ballot for presidential election would have been about affiliation to the TUC.

By Jon Silberman, AUEW convenor, Colman Fasteners

The AUEW membership, by our massiye yoic

favour of the retention or tne Dollical fund and Labour Party affiliation,

stand on being part of the

Socialist Action

fighting fund

rail. Our informed

coverage allowed us

successful

Socialist

in Manchester, North

West

Glasgow which were well

rai workers

and other class fighters in

wake of the guards

ballot defeat.

This record is what

engineering CUIR

rades expect Socialist Ac-

tion to emulate in rela-

won to me

events now facing

because of

WUT&CIL

because the course

pursued by the engineer-

ing unions right wing

leadership. They have re-

quested a special four-

page supplement in the

paper, aimed at clarify-

the "money for

ballots' issue and the

question of state in-

tervention

unions. Thirteen papers

шеге Ін anions those

who attended na-

AUEW * •Broad

Left rally in Birmingham

last weekend.

broader movement. But TUC general council recoiled stand. Instead the AUEW TONI taking this will ballot in November.

The executive given a commitment to the TUC spelt Laird's letter to Willis, simply 'the ballot

... will contain that ALEW (EFC) as an attilate of the TUC acknowledges the authority of congress and accepts that under the direction the general council the consequential effect of a 'yes' vote will mean suspension from the TUC":

The executive 2150 committed themselves ensure the ballot 'meets the joint spirit of our discussion'.

Ther bunote until

will not known until

Most important of all has been our coverage of

South Africa and Central

America. Successful

sales have been held

places not previously

tried.

Last weekend, over

100 papers were sold in

East London markets,

over 20 in the centre of

Manchester, and good

sales in other centres

mainly to black people.

Yet weekly publica-

tion of our paper is not

secure. Particularly dur-

regular

ing me sulumer.

financial contributions

have been

disrupted. This was the

hasis for the appeal to

our engineering and rail

We ask every sup-

porter to rush donations

to the editorial

We are not crying wolf

Our weekly

threatened if we do not

get a major increase

lomations rapidly.

helps.

Please send your

tion to Socialist Action,

PO Box 50, N1 2XP.

TUC Congress 1985 ...

Engineers lead stated that they apply for further funding until it is

But given the effective one-two they have got going Hammond and the EETPU leaders, this is ment the f commitment. EETPU have

applied for government cash and the cheque is in the post.

Moreover, the TUC leadership did not challenge the AUEW the political terrain of accepting cash ballots. Instead they concentrated exclusively the question of the authority or ine general council and congress itself But if AUEW and EETPU members are to be won to

'no' vote in the coming ballots, they be convinced that accepting state funding loi the unions compromises the union's independence.

The question of the independence from the state of the AUEW, indeed of the entire trade union movement is the key one. But the TUC general coun

cil has already compromis

ed itselt on this issue of

principle. Union leader-

ship after union leadership have complied WILD Trade Union eats 1984

for in

stance by stipulating that

their members hold ballots

before taking industrial

With the notable ex

ception of the NUM, this

also goes for the left

leaderships.

But there is deep

position in the ranks to

state intervention. In the

itself a wave of

protest greeted

ecutive council circular on

the need for ballots before

industrial action, such that

Gavin Laird was forced to

make a public retraction in

the August issue of the

union's journal.

this deep-felt

sentiment that the cam-

paign for a 'no' vote must

appeal. Laird and Ham-

mond have threatened to

split the movement if they

can win their members to a

'yes' vote.

The splitters can be

defeated. The alternative

would be a wnolesale

climbdown by the TUC on

its opposition to the cash-

ballot-laws.

for ballots'

AT AN AUEW presidential eve-of-poll rally

Birmingham Broad Left candidate John Tocher came strongly for a 'no' vote in the coming ballot on acceptance of government cash. 'Once an independent union starts accepting state funding,' he declared, "it's

thin end of the wedge to state control.'

Tocher challenged his audience not to think this is impossible. 'Our history shows it is true. He who

the piper calls the Days

Voting in this, the first round of the battle fo president, goes on until 29 recenteer Tocher spelt out what he now considers to be the chief issue of the

the crossroads. people have shown that they want to take us beyond the Rubicon. mem bers al c already consorting with the scab union of Nottinghamshire miners.

hey're opposed to ai

ruggle with the gover ment or the employers.'

Tocher condemned what he described as the

'ultra right' leadership of prepared to see a spire AUEW. *They LIC

Hammond they have been blatantly

flouting TUC decisions

daring the general counci

to take them on.'

He contrasted the hard

line ets eadership

engineers' in

the face of TUC decisions

with their stance towards

the bosses. 'That's the

Socialist Action

Tocher says 'no cash

thing with these people.

They get very tough with They get very iough with trade unions. But if they meet an angry employer can't see them for dust!'

But Tocher backed the Willis-Laird agreement. I

at TUC

He said:

bistory.

instructed to run

and its position on driver only operation.

we refused, we were sent home. the trade union movement!

13 September 1985 5

TUC Congre

think the general council did the right thing. Now must for a there's another . "yes" vote, trade union movement will either have to be prepared for a split or dilute its policies to accomodate the AUEW.

Railworkers

THE TUC congress was notably silent on the issue of a rail strike and the plight of sacked guards. But during the GCHQ debate, Scorfish railworker PÅT DEVITT took the opportunity to highlight the driver only dispute.

ISTARTED with the railways in 1938, more than 27 years ago. In July of this year rail workers in this area were issued with copies of their service

my particular case this showed an almost 100 per cent clear discipline and attendance record. But within three weeks I was sacked.

Why? Because I am a Glasgow Central guard.

Like guards in other parts of Britain we were issued with an ultimatum by management: we were

experimenta driver only operated trains and told to forget about past procedures of consultation and negotiation. We wen being asked to abandon any loyalty to our unior

We were being given a large sample of a nev jack-boot industrial relations policy of BR. Wher

When we continued to stand by our union, we were sacked.

This is the industrial tyranny railworkers now face, brought about by a combination of the anti-union laws introduced by the present government, alongside the threat of the dole queues if we refuse to click our heels when management snap their fin tyrants must be met with resistance. Long live

Page 6 scan of this page

Socialist Action 13 September 1985

The road to Soweto

THE SOUTH African state is unique. It does HOL 'diserminate' against the majority of its population, it excludes three quarters of them even from formal citizenship.

Nor is the apartheid state some backward relic. It is the most advanced industrial state in Africa. South Africa refutes any view that capitalism and 'free enterprise' automatically produce democracy or even political advance. On the ... dontrary, it is because of capitalism -, that the South African historically became more reactionary at every turn. It is because it is so politically backward that South African capitalism has been so successful.

How did such uniquely reactionary and racist state come into being? In a nutshell, it was born of colonisation, slavery, and gold.

Wave

The South African whites were colonists - and to this day call themselves Europeans. The first mass wave of settlers were Dutch farmers. Then in 1794. came the English to claim me strategically located Cape colony for their Empire.

But these whites were also slavers. And a slave by definition, is not human. They work but have no rights.

When in 1834 the British finally "freed' the Boers' slaves, the state and labour relations that. emerged were already branded with extreme oppression. The 1841 Master and Servants' Act made it illegal to break a labour contract; the Kaffir Employment Act forced black people to sign contracts and carry passes

In the three Boer states black people had no vote and the Transvaal constitution bluntly stated the people want no equality of white and black inhabitants either in church or state'.

In North America those who colonised the interior of the continent, and who farmed the land with their own labour, had already won independence when they forged the final form of the United States constitution. These small farmers in alliance with the radical bourgeoisie, and workers, defeated the save -StaLes and had to proclaim freedom for all on their banner in the US civil war.

Diamonds

In South Africa the interior was instead colonised by slavers fleeing from the British. They drove the inhabitants off the land and set them to work - as wage labourers without political rights. When there was struggle for independence from Britain at the beginning of the 20th century it was waged by the most backward, cramped and reactionary sectionof South African society

the Boers This struggle for independence had white supremacy openly inscribed on its banner.

Nevertheless it was just conceivable that the unstable Boer farm could have produced a development - an alliance of poor and proletarianised whites with dispossessed Africans against landlords and imperialists. This was a type of pattern which was seen in South America. But one discovery determined a completely different course: gold.

Diamonds had already been found in 1870. In 1886 the largest gold fields in the world were discovered. The profits were stupendous, standing even today at up to a hundred per cent higher

the average industrial average. This development allowed an agreement of the British and the Boers.

A deputation of Boers visited Britain within a month of their defeat in Ine Boer war of 1899-1902. sought assurance from the government that the recent dispute between the white races would change nothing in the status of the black'

They need not have worried. The British imperialist Cecil Rhodes, who by 1900 controlled the mining industry,

had already introduced the 'Glen Grey

Act in 1894 — calling it his 'Native Bill

for South Africa. Its purpose was to merely drive blacks off their land and into his mines.

*Every black man cannot have three acres and a cow'., Rhodes declared It must be brought home to them that in future nine-tenths of them will have to spend their lives in daily labour.

short the transplanted the Boer system of labour relations from the land to the mines welcoming the system the Boers had developed with open arms.

Struggle SLalC Africans were to be confined by

force to a tiny portion of the land, denied the right to settle in the towns, and herded into the mines and factories by sjamboks and starvation.

Africans movements were rigorously controlled by Pass Laws and forced segregation. They were to become an institutionalised migrant labour force deprived of the most basic right of all: the right to form a community by living where they chose.

The profits of South Africa were imperialist. They derived from the combination of minéral monopoly and super-exploited labour were opened up by foreign capital.

But despite losing the war the Boers managed one unique feat. They maintained control of their own capital and siphoned off a portion of the superprofits of the British. They used this to create a white bloc uniting all from the richest mineowner landless Boer. With it they forged a new SLaLC. Instead of uniting with the black

people to throw out the imperialists the Serialises to suppress the blacks. Time. secured the blacks, by virtue of a common goal with the British, to a white supremacist state — a unique fusion of settler and imperialist capital, a state which was not a nation state but a purely settler state of the white people.

Black

The chosen instrument for this process was the Boer National Party formed in 1902. It was this party which 'invented' Apartheid.

Party in turn was linked to a network of institutions of Afrikaner capital such as its rided 19nk), its first investment house, (founded 1934), trust, Federale (founded 1940) and the infamous secret society, the Broederbond.

The National Party finally won its

electoral victory in 1948 and it has

governed ever since. But this simply

culminated a forty-year process during

Afrikaner capital through political alliance with British imperialism what it had lost in the war against it.

The rise of the apartheid state was inexorable In 1913

WORKERS UNION OF AFRICA system different

Act, known to Africans as the 'Law of Dispossession', confined black to 7 per cent of the land. The 1923 Urban Areas Act prevented blacks settling in the towns and introduced a uniform pass system. A succession of segregationist measures between drove black, coloured and Indian people off the voters' roll.

In Labour relations the principles of the original Masters' and Servants Act They were re-enforced again and again and British were coupled to the pass system. It was virtually illegal to strike - and black strikes were broken

mass arrests, and often mass CIS SESSO shootings The risk of any alliance bet

ween black workers and poor whites was prevented by white wage rates 8-10 times higher than those of blacks and by depriving black people of skilled

British imperialists

the poorest

WAS with the

of current events.

The National

the black trade unions.

Volksbeleggings jobs and education.

invention

achieved

Land had gone before.

before.

" COMMERCIAL C

'reform'

blood industry

the Wall Arcal state

• Segregation

with mass

homes

the Soweto rebellion of 1976 that focused world attention on the new rise of black revolt in long history South Africa. It is the starting point of most people's knowledge of South Africa and the direct background

ALAN

Soweto was the political backdrop to the rapid rise of

It showed that the long year's of 1976.

Apologists for Britain's support for the South African regime often try to claim that apartheid was some peculiar LOWIIS

abberation which will eventually disappear when "English good sense' prevails. But when communities the National Party government of 1948 began to implement apartheid formally it was only making systematic what had been developed with full British support in the entire hundred years that court.

Apartheid, however, was not mere. ly a 'logical' development of what went cibly resettled under

It was the only possible way to defend it. This is why every hope of

apartheid has so far been dashed and every mass movement for civil rights has finally been drowned in

Why? Because once mining capital began to expand, as it had to, into in-

tical effect dustry proper, then it was inevitable laborator that the urban black population would start to grow. Eight million black col - paratus which is among of the most oured and Indian people today work in

making it ever more im- world. possible to maintain the pure fiction that the "black' nation belonged in its rural homelands. It became more and more necessary to politically exclude blacks from any rights in the South

comodate the

The legislative keystone of apartheid was therefore the Group Areas act of 1950 — which created segregated esidential areas for whites, coloured Africans and Indians. By 1979 550,00 people had been evicted from their

under this act and shipped off been its victims. either to makeshift townships, driven back into permanent migrant status (by being officially resident in the Bantu

of apartheid's strengthening were coming to an end.

But South Africa had a

of struggle before that great revolt of 1976 - a history without which the present struggle cannot be understood.

FREEMAN looks at the rise of the apartheid state - and at the history of black resistance which led to the explosion

homelands but obliged to work in the towns) or by fording blacks into the twilight existence of the illegal shanty

Women were particular victims of a : system designed to prevent stable urban

emerging Under the

Natal Code black women are perpetual legal minors with no right to own or inherit property, act as guardians of their children or represent themselves

A staggering total of 6 million Africans have been uprooted and for-

this policy inevitably, because of the ever-growing threat to white rule created by black

resistance, this policy has gone hand in hand with growing repression, and

growing political exclusion.

The "theory' of apartheid provides

for 'independent' black administra

tions in the bantu areas. But the prac

is that the hated col bodies in the bantustans

simply serve as part of a repressive ap-

sophisticated and well-equipped in the white

The real intention of the entire

system is simple: it is to deprive blacks

of any right to be present, or even to

vote, in the real bodies of power in the

country: in those of the white state.

Such a state as that of South Africa

cannot be 'reformed'. . It cannot 'ac-

black people whose

whole purpose it is to subjugate. It is

not even a national state of South

Africa. It is a purely white state.

That apartheid state can only be

overthrown. And that task falls to the

black population of South Africa who,

for four hundred and thirty years, have

The struggle against

apartheid is one to smash the entire ex-

isting state structure in South Africa

and everything that sustains it.

Sout

histor

Origins of th

apartheid st

THE BLACK people of South Africa have been writing history of resistance since the first Portuguese settlers were driven out in 1948. By 1879 the Zulu forces which headed resistance to the Boers, had 50,000 troops in arms and inflicted a stunning defeat on the British army.

The modern history of black resistance in South Africa however starts with same process which created apartheid in its modern form - with the rise of the black working class.

Apartheid finally is creating its own gravedigger. The racist South African state is founded on an army of black labour which grows in proportion to

South African capitalism's development. Not surprisingly, therefore, the history of resistance to apartheid, and of resistance to South African capitalism, have been intertwined at every step.

Successive leaderships have ex plored 'peaceful' reform only to find this road barred by the South African state. Eighty years of bitter struggle have progressively shown black people that they cannot just defy the apartheid state. They must overthrow it. The successive waves of struggle have shifted the movement progressively leftwards In is orientation.

The very first modern movement of revolt Ghandi's 1906 campaign goainst nesses for ndians - Hustrated this dynamic clearly. Ghandi, the

Page 7 scan of this page

h Africa's

te tounder -of resistance, openly opposed the strike movement which it produced. But his movement was already merging into a much wider one against the proposed 'whites only' government of the new Union of South Africa in 1909.

1909 in turn saw the first countrywide movement of Africans and in 1912 the African Native National Congress

- renamed the African National Congress (ANC) in 1923 - heard Pixley Seme, a young black lawyer, that: "The white people of this country have formed what is known as the Union of South Africa - a union in which we have no voice in the making of laws and no part in their administraTOn. We have called you therefore to this conference so that we can together devise ways and means of forming our creating national unity and defending our rights and privileges.'

World War I however exposed the weaknesses of the ANC's largely middie class founding leadership. Believing a British victory could bring reform, the ANC leadership attempted to damp down struggle and even recruited black people to fight for British colonial ambitions against Germans Namibia.

This stand aborted the mass movement which in 1913 had developed into the first anti-pass campaign organised by African women in the the Orange Free State, and the first sustained strike

of struggle

by blacks in the South African mines.

The mass struggle resumed after the war with a wave of union battles. In 1920 71,000 black miners struck. Chamber of Mines had to admit the struggle had practically paralysed the country'. Eleven miners were shot, but the power of black working people was now plain for all to see.

Out of the post World War I strike wave the Industrial and Commercial Union (ICU) was formed Clements Kadalie. Kadalie had led the 1919 Port Elizabeth dock strike. 1923 10,000 of the members wee womer

The 'constitutionality" however broke the ICU's back. Kadalie reacted to increasing repression by rejecting strikes as 'unconstitutional'. In 1926 he contrived to explain have the Communist Party of South Africa (CPSA) expelled

spontaneous 1927-28 pushed the ICU membership: up to 200,000 but the leadership renounced the strikes. The ICU broke up soon afterwards.

The 'constitutionality" of directly surfaced again in the political movement. The All Africa Convention (AAC) of 1935 brought African, Coloured and Indian peoples for the first time to oppose a segregation bill introduced by Prime Minister Hertzog. This bill effectively removed all non-Europeans from the voting rolls tion Councils' (NRCs) instead.

The AAC leadership however threw in itself into the NRC elections - claiming that they had to use whatever consitutional mechanisms were around to push the AAC's case.

In reality the NRCs were not merely powerless but instruments: of developing apartheid state. From this

and indeed

the resistance.

bluntly prohibited

one strike alone sixteen were shot dead.

were over 60

Non-European

and commerce Two

formed under strong fluence. The South African Trotskyists dissolved into it, and the Unity Move-

it made a propaganda fetish of the boycott tactic for mass mobilisations and actions. Simultaneously radical wing, the ANC Youth League, developed under leaders Mandela, Tambo and Sisulu.

unambiguously belonged to the indigenous people by right. Its adopted by the ANC as a whole in 1949, called for weapons: immediate boycott, strike, civil disobedience, non co-operation and such other means as may being about the accomplishment and realisation of our aspirations.'

Nationalism

The

its

Communist Party itself.

utilised the slogan 'workers of the

The largely

decisive turn to black workers onl

International.

Stalinism launched in the late 1920s

leaders and cut it off from the nationalists. This reduced the CPSA to a rump and created the space for an in-

The fluential Trotskyist movement.

followed every twist of Stalin's line and subordinated everything to support for

the ANC, the CPSA supported the old ANC leaders in for the NRC again under

boycott ticket.

By

the 1940s and 1950s black radicals were ICU's 30,000

not keen on the CPSA - and why the ANC Youth League initially developed

issue independently of it.

trom

strike wave in?

issue soon

together

'Native Representa-

the. 1914 ANC delegation

point on the issue of boycotting' these,

white institutions became a fundamental line of divide in troduce

In 1941, under the impact of wartime inflation, municipal, rail, dock, walked out in the Rand and Natal. This was under conditions where legislation

'all strikes by Africans under all circumstances.' In Sion

But despite this repression there In 1952 the

illegal strikes between 1942 and 1944. In 1942 the Council of

Trade Unions was ANC's formed. This at one point had 119 af- 7000 to 100,000 filiated unions and by 1945 represented 40 per cent of Africans in manufacture

political developments companied this process. In 1943 the specific measures Non-European Unity movement was

Trotskyist in- Bantu Authorities

ment adopted a ten-point programme of democratic demands. Unfortunately

being able to function. the ANC Principles the future ANC

The ANC Youth League stated

Programme of Action,

the following founding principles. and active jected this

it, black and white', ANC Youth League was distinguished not just by its militancy tion of our people.

African nationalism specifically did not consider itself Communist. That position, in turn, has to £l per be put in the context of the role of white working class organisations and of the

of South Africa

In 1922 striking white miners had

president. world fight and unite for a white South

White CPSA of the Africans, dapted to white pressure. It made under the pressure of the Communist

The ultra-left third period line of regarded as African.'

Opposing then purged the CPSA of successive

oppressed,

During World War II the CPSA

wards

the Allies' war effort. In 1947, back in

standing candidates — allegedly on a as against the ANC.

It is not suprising therefore that in

mass

When, in 1948, the National Party was elected to office and began to in-

apartheid ANC Youth League shot to leadership of the struggle. On 1 May 1950 a one day stoppage of work was met by savage repression Eighteen people were murdered by the authorities and a general strike was called for 16 June in mourning and protest. This in turn was greeted by the Suppres-

of Communism Act and man ANC leaders were driven underground

Defence Campaign was launched which turned the ANC into the broadest mass resistance body.

membership rose from at a time when black union membership talling to 38,000.

The Defiance Campaign, organised jointly with Coloured and Indian mass organisations, was to protest against six

including the Pass Laws, the Group Areas Act, and the

system. It was however led on Ghandian lines with 5000 selected 'defiers', and could not defeat the all out repression launched against the moment. By 1953 ANC membership had fallen to 28,000 with its key leaders jailed or prevented from

The ANC response under CP prompting, was to convene the 'Congress of the People' in 1956. This adopted the Freedom Charter (published in Socialist Action No. 111) which is now considereu vy me sive as part DE 1S

A militant wing of the ANC re-

development. Robert up. Sobukwe, who emerged as spokesper-

son of the opposition denounced the

hrase in the Freedom Charter readins 'South Africa belongs to all who live in

Sobukwe proclaimed that 'African Nationalism is the sole ideological basis for the salva-

Against a background of militant bus boycotts, a popular campaign for a

minimum wage, and generalised uprisings in the townships, the polarisation within the ANC grew. Faced with exclusion the dissidents in 1959 launched the Pan African Congress (PAC) with Robert Sobukwe as

'We aim, politically, at government

for the Africans', Sobukwe stated, 'with everybody who owes his loyalty only to Africa and who is prepared to accept the democratic rule of an African majority being

all collaboration with either the government or with white parties, the PAC declared 'there can be no cooperation between oppressor and

dominating

Although PAC influence after-

drastically declined measure orts support or me ume can be seen from the fact that the government 'survey' in 1963 found that 57 pei cent of all Africans supported the PAC

In December 1959 the PAC called for civil disobedience against the pass laws, and the ANC then called for a

day of action against the same laws in March. This was the political background to the date that is engraved

Socialist Action 13 September 1985

time: 21 March 1960 — Sharpville.

On that day police opened fire on unarmed demonstrators, killing 67 and injuring more than 180. Nearly all were shot in the back.

The pass laws were temporarily suspended but the mass mobilisation: went on. The-Justice Minister told parliament Their aim is to bring to its knees any white government in South Africa which stands for white supremacy ... they do not want peace and order; what they want is not £1 a day for all the Bantu; what they want is our country.'

Repression, then as now, was the only answer for the regime. Neither the PAC nor the ANC were prepared for the scale on which it was launched. On 8 April a wave of government terror was launched. Both the ANC and PAC were outlawed, 18,000 were arrested -including 1,700 activists.

This was the decisive turning point in South Africa because it marked the end of all projects for gradual reform or legal action. Both ANC and PAC responded by setting up armed wings.

The problem however was that this armed resistance became for a whole period counterposed to systematic mass acuon, bou orgamsawons at tne mme isolated themselves from the next wave of mass actions in the 1970s.

The next decisive developments in the black population were those produced by the capitalist nature of apartheid itself. The black urban working class grew inexorably despite all attempts to segregate it, deport it, deprive it of rights of settlement, and break it

Dorawing semi-legal townships shot up on the fringes of the industrial centres.

The movement which finally gave expression to the burning frustration of the youth of these townships is symbolised for the world in the person of Steve Biko.

Biko

Biko had led an all-black split from the National Union of South African Students (NUSAS) in 1968, forming the South African Students' Organisa tion (SASO) in 1969. SASO became the nucleus of the Black Consciousness movement: the proclamation thai Africans, Indians and 'coloured' consituated a single black nation in South Africa. As well as hearkening back to the Africanism of the ANC Youth League and the PAC, the black consciousness movement was strongly influenced by black American radicals and revo utionaries such as Malcolm y The movement was propelled by the defeat of the Portuguese colonialists on South Africa's northern borders.

It was under this movement's influence that, on May 17, 1976, school students in Soweto organised a boycott of Orlando West Junior Secondary school in protest against the new policy of making Afrikaans the main teaching language in the Transvaal.

The name 'Soweto' joined that of Sharpville in the world's memory as a symbol of anti-Apartheid struggle: but with a difference. For if Sharpville was the symbol of white repression, Soweto was the symbol of black revolt.

Since then the struggle in its different forms has never stopped.

Page 8 scan of this page

8

THE REAL character of the Socialist Party

government of nowhere more starkly revealed than in its policy in the French colony of New Caledonia.

On coming to power Mitterrand promised

the Kanak people of these islands 'peace and

independence'. Instead they have met torture, » rapidly escalating French police and military

imprisonment,

Kanak resistance to France has been mounting

rapidly and dominating the life of the country.

SUSANNA OUNEL a long-time activist in the

Kanak national liberation struggle,

what has been happening in New Caledonia and the

history of her people's struggle against the French

THE New Caledonia not

the colWhen tney arrived came

will

never kill because

from Ulllaudy only

the massacres.

In 1878, chief called

follow whạt French

the French rule in New

1917, when they fought World War

to France to

*why

defend the the French the Ger-

our killing

organised people to

in Paris. day, is in Paris. chief by the same people who

granulaticis and our

grandmothers — were too

scared revolt. The

repression was really

Up until 1946, the

Kanak people did not even

have the right to go into

the towns - • they first nad

to get permission from the

gendarmes (police).

Our people

mothers, our parents, and

were

humiliated every day.

Every day you would hear

the whites calling us 'dirty

Kanaks' - and 'Kanak',

for them, was a really pe-

jorative word.

The Kanak dress

frock introduced by the

missionaries throughout

the Pacific), for example,

is a symbol of our CUl-

onisation. The Kanak

dress was designed

distinguish the Kanak

women from the white

women. The Kanak

women did not have the

right to wear jeans OI

women's clothes.

They had to wear a Kanak

dress, that when the

tourists came they could

see these dresses and ad-

mire the "beautiful folk-

lore' of our country.

Socialist Action 13 September 1985

Mitterrand in France

and repression.

There explains

In 1953 Our parents formed the first Kanak political party, the Unior Caledonienne (UC) and they began to ask for an improvement in our living conditions.

called Naisseline

ing. Naisseline

1968 and students'

France. he arrived

work was really pejorative, fought

Then created the Red The Red

of our

of

cluding The

back again the struggle get strong.

wing began They

said Caledonia

became

said

Africa, because

ports did

from but from

We are the producers

gold, iron,

COC.

cobalt, He LOCE

And we have

tourists.

that our

freedom, the

protect uS from being

hungry

our country

lot of

young

Namouda.

Kanak.

The in-

spector never tried,

but

to France. In 1980 they

He was

visited

wages that were owing.

and opened He

light

since

they Jean-Pierre

Declerca,

from He was

PON

REVOLUTIONN

this year by French colonial forces general secretary • of the

Jnion Caledononienne. After each killing ILIUIC and more people demonstrated.

The total population of New Caledonia 140,000. But the Kanak people are only 60,000 in countrie The white French, alre descended from those who came 1853 (the Caldoches) 49,500 30,500 The are

Chinese, Wallis Islanders, Tahitians, and other im-

migrants. This figure also

includes an estimated

20,000 French civil

vants and their families,

temporarily resi-

dent in New Caledonia.

INDEPENDAND KANAK:

Kanaks fight

for freedom

Eloi Machoro, Kanak leader assassinated on 12 January

We the word

began to tions.

Out of 7000

The immigrants

3000-strong FLNKS demonstration in Noumea on 11 March perialism from Algeria, all the traitors from Vanuatu,

traitors from Vietnam. We get that sort of refugee!

The ernment has said that we will through referendum,

ple who parent born in Caledonia

We made concession

tions,

tims of refuse out rights as indigenous

The French 'socialist" government of Mitterrand sent special envoy

negotiate for them

Edgard Pisani said he together, to meet lal tes bring

'communities'.

Communities? They

can call other ethnic communities

cause they are from over-

We are

seas, Dur nut us not Kanaks are the true people community,

of the land

On the question of

negotiations, we say we do

not want a plan for in-

dependence drawn up

France for us to just sign

We do not Walt neo-

colonial independence where bases hers

military bases and

control of our economy.

We want true economic,

Duntical ana cultural in-

dependence and then

negotiate our

agreements as • a 50c

nation with other

sovereign nations. Kanak

sovereignty our

right in New Caledonia. I

is not negotiable.

KArL

Kanak have

our freedom. 1853 our

fought against the bloody

, hid their onisation.

them.

today it is because the great

our grandCullaze mothers

seriod o

plantations they worked

pregnant they had birth. Since then, the of our women

clear after Sometimes

army

Wt

A LO betwen

and anywhere

They

don't then the husband

Hallk. about

because

They said

traception. 1982 we

exploited the struggle

the We

not

society to

life.

Before colonisation

our had

Kanak Since the

News

it is a 'crime'. the 14 and Kanak

they

We did not in the bush.

hypocritical

witholding

Our

colonialism of

from

necause l

do every job.

because

the

they what was happening their own

must see

In our

not only but also

along; we together

think we change Kanak brothers, both Kanak and men

fight side with

land them,

ricades

FLNKS. each

of im.

perialism.

Today in New

Caledonia is the

few white

whites other

problems

tney can that out

themselves

came to

were

women. wanted me

the Kanak

racist systei

secure.

But th

will ge

our If they

they

wanted

all of

us.

end. nothing

Page 9 scan of this page

Surplus Value

THE STRUGGLE in Africa sharply poses one of the most central questions of socialist theory: the relation between the struggle of the working class and the revolutionary fight democratic demands.

JOHN ROSS looks at the historical development of the way Marxists have posed the relation between democratic and socialist revolutions.

THE of the relation democratic revolution and socialism was posed right from the beginning of Marxism. The first revolution which Marx participated - the German revolution of 1848 — saw a comprele of revolution and the socialist movement of the working class. The development which arose from ir was termed by Marx permanent revolution.

The core of the process Marx analysed simple. The demands of the 1848 revolution in Germany were bourgeois democratic. Above all they were for the unification of the German nation into a single democratic state — thereby overcoming the fragmentation of Germany into a series of reactionary monarchic statelets dominated by the remnants of feudalism.

with these democratic of the revolution Marx, in March 1848, fundamental document the Demands

ofe Communist demin dermany.

crucial declaration was that:

Germany shall be declared a single

indivisible republic! gramme then went on to outline the demands for a universal right to vote, the arming of the people, the complete destruction of feudal relations in land. and a series oi other revolu tronary bourgeois measures.

But while the immediate tasks of the 1848 revolution were bourgeois democratic it rapidly became evident that the bourgeosie itself had no intention whatever of seriously fighting for them. By July 1848, in his The Bill Proposing the Abolition of Feudal Obligations, Marx could Germany to the great bourgeois revolnon or lue eighteentn century and write that: 'the German revolution of 1848 is merely a parody of the French revolution of 1789'

The German revolution was a 'parody, in particular,

Jerman bourgeoisie, unlike French, refused to ally peasantry to smash its decisive enemy

- the feudal landowners and monarchy. As Marx wrote: bourgeoisie of 1848 unhesitatingly betrays the peasants, natural allies. .. and without whom it cannot stand up to the aristocracy.

By refusing mobilise peasantry, who provided the potential mass base of the revolution, and the direct enemy the feudal downers, the capitalist class aborted the bourgeois revolution itself.

The reason for the refusal of the bourgeoisie Lany decisive struggle against the monarchy was clear to Marx. By 1848, the capitalist class in Germany was more scared of the working class than

reason it refused to unleash thorough going revolutionary struggle at all.

Marx summarised the situation in December 1848 in his The Bourgeoisie and the Counter-Revolution: German bourgeoisie developed sluggishly, timidly and slowly that at the moment when it menacingly confronted teudalism and absolutism. saw menacingly pitted against itself the proletariat From the first it (the bourgeoisle, was betray the people and to compromise wilt une crowned rebresent ves the old society.

The conclusion of this situation was simple. Marx had already outlined it in November 1848 in his Victory of the Counter-Revolution in Vienna: *The bourgeoisie in Germany meekly Jols le monarchy and of feudalism before securing even the first conditions of

South of

democratic

key

and

bourgeois

published a

'The whole of

This pro-

freedom and its rule

carry LEHOUST bourgeois democratic revolution.

democratic

bourgeois however had verv sions,

Engels French

February. becausede

the ble.

with the bourgeoisie

"The German rendering

are its

the

lantion meant bourgeois

through any

feudal

corned any 'While

"The

positions,

Power inclined

Germany. But

Tried though.

absolute Bismarck.

8000000H:

Democratic

socialist

revolutions

existence necessary for its own civic

In short the bourgeoisie refused and was unable to

tasks the LITt intact.

such a rerusat or lne bourgeolsie No 10 carry through the tasks of the

democratic revolution definite concluwhich formed the core of Was a Marx's theory of permanent revolution. These conclusions were spelt out by Engels in his Campaign for the had

'Ever since the

Nor

tions. itself

HOIC

the

The refusal,

which of the revolution biwality petty

from their ruling proletariat has

In the event the revolutions of Walil

1848 did not transfer political power

mo une nands or tne workig class in

precisely for that

reasons the tasks of the bourgeois

democratic revolution were not car-

Naturally history could not be halted entirely. Twenty years later, in the

January 1871, Germany was united by

But far from being

bourgeois democratic unification of

the state it was an extreme reactionary

The large landed estates, above all those of Prussian Junkers, were left

The monarchy was retained. democratic constitution established. Germany was united by the most reactionary state within it — Prussia. What was produced by 1871

grotesque caricature goals of 1848.

It was an understanding of what

occurred In Germany became a basis of Lenin's analysis of

development of the Russian

twentieth century. at the beginning of the • Lenin understood .... perfectly well that by the beginning of this century it was impossible to maintain the semi-feudal relations in land which continued to dominate Kussia

could the Tsarist autocracy, which rested on these landed rela-

survive. The establishment of capitalist relations in land in Russia had to be achieved. But this could be done in one of two ways.

The first was the type agriculture seen in the United States, and aimed for in 1848 in Germany:

establishment of a free holding peasantry and the abolition of the large landed estates. The second possibility • was the reactionary "Prussian' path which had occurred in Germany that is a development

maintained the large downers and everything tied to them.

Lenin spelt out these alternatives

The Agrarian gramme of Social Democracy in the First Russian Revolution: ' 'Capitalist development in Russia has made such strides during the last half-century that the preservation of serfdom in agriculture has become absolutely impossible, and its abolition has assum-

nation wide revolution. But the abolition of serfdom in a bourgeois country is possible in two ways

*Serfdom may be abolished by the feudal-landiord evolving into Junker-bourgeois economies the other path development have called the American path of development, in contrast to the former, the Prussian

too, involves the forcible break-up of the old system of landownership ... But this essential and inevitable break up may be carried out in the interests of the peasant masses and not of the landlord gang!

The task of the working class in Russia, in Lenin's view, was to propell

agrarian revolution in 'American' direction — that is to the revolutionary division of the great landed estates which had been aimed

at in 1848.

struggle outlined an algebraic formula - that the degree to wels revolution would grow over into a Dro

letarian revolution would be determined by the degree of preparedness of the working class. This perspective of the was outlined by Lenin in his Two Tac-

of Social Democratic Revolution in June 1905 102 for example

What Lenin left open by this formula was the relation between the democratic revolution socialist revolution. In some of his writings they are seen as close in time and part of an interconnected process. In others, the majority, they are clearly seen as significantly separated in time and in their political mechanics. Trotsky

up Marx and Engels' formula of 1848

of — that of the permanent revolution.

Irotsky but torward the ana vsis tha the tasks of the bourgeois democratic land- revolution in Russia would be carried

out not prior to but following and via the establishment of the DOWCI of the establishment of the dictatorship of the proletariat. lan- More precisely in

democratic tasks would be solved, in Trotsky's Pro- Revolution, through:

ship of the proletariat which has risen to powel as the democratic revolution?

democratic revolution is conceivable only through the dictatorship of the proletariat which bases itself on the alliance with the peasantry and solves first of all the tasks of the democratic revolution!

significance of democratic tasks, the slowly social content of the intitial period of

the dictatorship

of could be one that was as yet bourgeois

democratic. Trotsky wrote, replying to his critic Preobrazhensky, that history had shown through revolution that: "the only road for solving the peasant

letarial he result has that pro-

letariat! The result "socia: content under the dictator ship of the proletariat (based on an alliance with the peasantry can remain during a certain period of time

an not socialist as yet.

Trotsky noted for China, for example, in his article Summary and Perspectives of the Chinese Revolu-

Socialist Action

dictatorship

political hands of Nicaragua

tatorship

revolution

fulfilled

working class.

As only

As regards the political outcome

Lenin

which the bourgeois working

Democracy in ended

and the

proletariat,

It was Trotsky who explicitly took place,

analysis lildl

political working class the

Russia the

in Permanent "The dictator violent leader of the

More generally: the victory of the

The

Precisely because of the decisive

Not the proletariat proletariat? democratic

the Russian

question lies sky

was that

13 September 1985 9

tion that: the social content of tha boureois democratic revolution wi fill the initial period of the comir.

of the Chinese pro letariat and the peasant poor

This perspective has developed ir real life and not simply in Russia -where the land question was solven after the October revolution, le atte

power had passed into itthe working class. for example politica power passed into the hands of the working class in July 1979, the dic

proicialla established, but as yet the 'social con tent' of that dictatorship remains on: of a bourgeois democratic revolution

Naturally the theory of permanen

did not mean that bourgeois democratic tasks can_be

anywhere firsi establishing the state power of the

with Germany after 1843 history will not stand still. If certain tasks cannot be fulfilled by revolttionary democratic means then the: will be fulfilled by other bourgeois -one might say Prussian - means.

But an alternative other than the political power of the working class means that these democratic tasks wil be carried out in a partial, and not a thorough going, way - a process seer from Ireland at the end of World Wa I, through the independence of India. up to the liberation of Zimbabwe Ir all of these cases, precisely because the state power of the working class was not established, the tasks of th bourgeois democratic revolution we::

carried out in a partial, 1. complete, and aborted way.

The same applies to South Africa It is extremely unlikely, and excludei in today's conditions, that aparthei could be smashed in South Africa without revolution and the establish ment of the political power of the

Nevertheless purel! theoretically — in a different interna tional context for example - it can not be entirely exluded that at leas: major aspects of apartheid could be

without the overthrow of capitalist rule. That depends on the

development of the situation, the degree of preparedness of the black South African workers, the in ternational situation and so on

Bur if the political power of th working class, the dictatorship of th

is not established, ther even the democratic tasks of the th: revolution will not be carried throug: in a thorough-going way. A thorough: going agararian reform transferin, land to the black farmers will not taki

single South African tionality will not be welded together every vestige of racism will not be ex tirpated from the state. Without th political power of the working class the dictatorship of the proletariat, be ing established not only will socialism not be achieved but even thoroughgoing democracy will not be created

The black working class of Sourt Africa must throw itself complete!! into the democratic revolution agains apartheid. It must carry it througt completely to its conclusion - to thi

overthrow ot the aparther It must seek through thes means to establish the political powe of the working class in South Africa

working class must clearly understand that to the degree that th political power of working class is no established in South Africa so also th democratic revolution will be aborted

Will the South African working class, through the struggle to over-

apartheid, succeed establishing the dictatorship of the

Or will even revolution be largely aborted? It is impossible to decide it advance. Only struggle, not specula tion, decides these issues

But in his formula for Russia Trot-

the line march of the black South Africar working class: "The dictatorship o: the proletariat which has risen 1o power as the leader of the democrati:

The establishment of the political state, power of the working class a the leader of the democratic resolu

That is the axis of the Soutt African revolution.

Page 10 scan of this page

10 Socialist Action

fight back

DEPTFORD LABOUR Party's black section is asking for an all-black short list when the party selects a candidate to replace sitting MP John Silkin. But the local black section had agreed to withdraw from the selection procedure, under pressure from part of the local left', after agent Kath Butler threatened the party that it would not be allowed to proceed with selection otherwise.

Silkin himself announced in July that be wold ITUL be standing again, after a three-year battle to remove him.

Local black members are convinced that he was driven into EITS when he realised he would face massive. opposition from the black community.

'His announcement came directly after he was closely questioned on

sections Drake ward in July,' explained Man Mohan from the black section. Mohan said the Deptford black section does let the local party off the hook

We are challenging the local party, just as East

13 September 1985

Black sections

Lewisham is challenging the NEC, he said. "Do they mean what they or are they also racialists?

withdrew from the selection but now we want

what they have to offer black people.

'Fine words are not enough. Our local government committee circularised all branches regarding nomination for the pane for the 1986 elections. said "the LCG requests branches blacks, ethnic minorities, and women". So far we have seen none. We are testing 1o see how much our wnie comrades nical what they say'.

So far only four constituencies have selected

(plus 20p p&p).

to:

2XP

black candidates without a challenge from Walworth Road. At least five more are NEC threat because their black sec10HS are involved in the selection procedure.

During the 1982 witchhunt, it was only because local parties stood up to NEC threats of disbandment that witchhunters were forced into a temporary retreat. Growing pressure from sections of the 'left to capitulate to NEC not onliy weakens local democracy but leads them to turn their fire on the party's black members.

'We'll never get the transformation to socialist party,' said national black sections vice chair Mark Wadsworth,

bones conne agents in overriding black SELLIONS rights sake of bureaucratic

and good housekeeping.

A New Socialist Action pamphlet, price 50p

Bulk order rates available on request. Write

NUM pamphletaPO Box 50, London N1

ON 8 OCTOBER 1985 the trial of Gerald Pryce and four other black youths is due to start at the Old Bailey. Gerald is the brother of Eustace Pryce, a sixteen year old Afro-Caribbean who was murdered by white racists in Newham last November. charged with attray -racists who killed his brother.

Justice for the Pryces Committee, which is fighting for the charges to be dropped, and to publicise the

been treated by the police and the British courts. ON NOVEMBER 29th 1984, 16 year old Eustace Pryce was murdered by racists on the streets of Newham.

The murder happened after racists provoked a fight, and black vouths responded.

Eustace was not even involved in the fight, but was stabbed in the back of the neck and died almost immediately.

Three plain clothes 1011Ce officers actually witnessed the incident from a bus. Their response was predictable. They did not arrest the murderer but instead Eustace's brother on the grounds that he was in a distraught state and looked as though he was about to something dangerous.

He was then denied the right to go with his dying brother to the hospital,

taken to Plaistow police station. When aunt tried to visit Gerald at the station, she allowed to see him, and he was only Fine that his later to that his brother was dead.

The police brutality continued in the weeks that followed, and Gerald was re-arrested December 18th, and charged with affray. He was con tinuously denied bail and only releast on Januat. 7th, under restrictive bail conditions.

The white murderer, on the other hand, was only arrested after considerable community pressure and was given bail almost immediately, the grounds that it would be wrong keep him prison over Christmas.

The bail conditions imposed on Gerald since

Labour must fight

racist attacks

THE FOLLOWING letter outlining steps that can be taken by local Labour parties in the fight against racist attacks is being circulated by the Labour Left Co-ordination.

Dear friends, The last few weeks have seen an upsurge of fatal TaLs attacks black

Country: The media have country. media have concentrated on the more serious arson incidents, but for each of these there are many attacks which go unreported. We

write to draw the attention

Justice for

He is for fighting back against the

Below we publish the appeal circulated by the

outragous way Gerald and his entire family have

January (which were only reduced on July 31st) meant that he could not even come into Newham to see his family, friends or pregnant girlfriend. Gerald been denied the basic human right mourn with his family while the murderer of his of local Labour Parties and trade unions to these attacks, and o demand that they take them seriously, using all political and organisational facilities available to them an effort to passing of a beyond the routine resolutio! - Important though that may Dalli and union branches should consider calling (public) meetings to for example: • show the strength of anti-racists in ine area. • compile a list of those who are willing to carry out various

the Pryces

brother walks free.

The Pryce family are not alone in their sutfering, and the catalogue of Michael Been violence

was kill in Hacknev When his friends carried him to the police statior they were treated though they were criminals by police officers whe left Michael bleeding unattended in the station. Hit later alea in nospital. In the courts, the callousness continued and Michael's mother, shocked by light sentences given to his murderer forcibly removed and thrown into a prison cell.

The message from the police and courts is clear

tasks, eg meetings with Black organisations. lobbying local . authorities, developing a public profiie, etc

• set up a telephone tree

of contacts and advertise the fact through leatlets, posters ano the local paper o be available at short

notice to provide practical and physical support to victims of racist attacks.

Harry Cohen, Labour MP

for Leyton, has taken the

initiative through the pro-

mollon Private

Member's Bill, entitled

the Harassment

News

pere is no lustice for biack people, when members of our community are murdered their families are treated as criminals.

Gerald goes on trial on October 8th, alongsid two Asian and two Afro Carribean youths, also charged with affray. Com munity pressure resulted in Gerald's condition. being partially relaxed, and only community pressure will finally bring about justice for the Pryce family.

Remember Eustace ... Defend Gerald.

For details contact: Justice for the Pryces Suppor Committee, PO Box 273 Forest Gate, London E7 Tel: 555 8151 Bill, which deserves discussion and support.

Labour Party members should prepared work alongside others in broad-based campaigns to counter these attacks. In ment played a major role

repelling attacks fascists on Jewish people Exercise in the repeat this exercise in the Comradely greetings,

Narendra Makanji, larg Labour Party Black

sections

Dary Jones. secretar

Labour Left Coordination

Page 11 scan of this page

Women's Action Committee

News

THE LABOUR WOMEN'S Action Committee as usual will be campaigning around conference resolutions and elections aimed at improving the represen.tation of socialist women in parlament and public life, in order to promote the needs of oppressed women — black, working class, lesbian, and others — everywhere.

WAC sponsored

with one exisolatio, ception, are under 'Women's Organisation' on the asen la pad Resolution and 24 underline the need remedy the powerlessness

women's donerece and the national Labour women's committee. whose demands for posinve achiol tor val ty women have been ignored year after year.

Motions 16-24 reiterate WAC's constantly tabled demands for the omen's conference to elect the women s secuon or tue national executive and be allowed table tive resolutions at party conterence, ana lor trie mikelsion of at least one woman*?* blend into a composte and

every wallallculal y

junction which would

Savage,

Hospital suspended for alleged malpractice.

of the Royal College

can bestow.

the polities of childbirth.

Three of five COllI-

plaints against her involve

breech tHruus. Gordon

Bourne, regional adviser

mortality,

was called id Wendys study

Tien. He and

other male opponents con-

cluded she carried out

caesarian sections during

childbirth "too late'

He delivers breech bir-

ths by caesarian as a mat-

ter of course. But Wendy

at Party conference

low-paid

shortlist.

Only 12 women have so lar heen selected for safe Labour seats. Calls from the '8 women' s conterence for this situation remedied L0 OC VIZCILY

By Josie Edwards, WAC Press Officer

before the next general election have been ignored by the party institutions This line is underwritten in the one resolution not on the women's section of the agenda. This is 31, which demands mediate action get women into parlamentary shortlists. Isolated in the 'party franchise' section ot the pad, this could fail to

riske nel being debated.

A Savage Suspension

LAST MONDAY the Hight Court refused an in-

have reinstated Wendy the consultant obstetrician at Mile End

Only weeks ago she was awarded the Fellowship of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists — the highest honour her profession

She faces a two-year inquiry and a ruined career because she disregards her male colleagues' views on

believes women prefer not nave surgical Veldul during childbirth, and lets them have

By Valerie Coultas

vaginal births if possible.

She only intervenes if she has to.

Doctors, with their attention focused on rising up the profession with ex-

One can but wonder aloud

the standing orders

chis odd agenda place-

odd agenda placement!

In the NEC elections, WAC CLOONE LILI four rather than the full five wornen needed for the women's section. These

Maynard MP Margaret Beckett MP.

Short MP and Diane ANDOLL Westminster city cillor and black CeLLOE

The missing name ALLIVINL. is Francis Morrell, leader of ILEA who cannot be nominated since she is not, this year, conference

lelegate

This highlights the wal the party machine works against women. Existing NEC members and MPs are eligible ex-officio, but

contenders not in parlament have delegates.

For very good reasons different party members will want the experience of attending conferences, but the condition I2CH

pensive techniques, may

find it quicker, easier and

more controllable to resort

to a surgical operation.

But maternal death is three

HIKC Y

result and no wollel.

wants to sutter the trauma

of an operation during

birth or the effects of that

operation when the child is

Wendy's suspension

has deprived Tower

Hamlets wollell

obstetrician, though the

Bengali community's

religion dictates female

COCIO for female pa-

tients, and 80 per cent of

Britain's women prefer

female attention during

maternity and childbirth.

Wendy is staunch

defender of the Nationa

NEC hopefuls must always be delegates is a

shibboleth designed to keep new faces with new ideas at bay.

Among these, of

are women committed to reform in parlia- LOUISE. mentend so illich wil

TeOrH which favour the oppressed half of the population: women.

The arguments to de fend this condition are similar to those denied Women Against Pit Closures membership of the NUM

that encourages 'undesirable elements' This is nonsense since : the nominations for the NEC by CLPs ensures that NEC contenders are thoroughly known within the party

These problems may come to a head soon. The insulting way in which the

section the NEC, through being only one elected b full

onference rather than separate interest, becomes a political football for parLy uci.

Helen Bradley's drawing of suffragette Annie Kenney ir Miss Carter Came With Us. Labour women are stil fighting for votes for women to elect their own section of the NEC

Service and op-

poses who

resources to line their

packets. SDOKe up

against proposed

£100,000 test tube baby

clinic to serve private pa-

tients the last thing

needed, she said, in a low-

income, large-family area. Sosure op sei 10 LA

closure Mile End

hospital and favoured

community based, decen-

tralised health centres.

Her clinics are to be

taken over by John Har-

tgill, senior •OSLCLTI-

Call the London

Hospital, and

thusiastic private health

For £400 he

Draculiunei

provides ante-natal care,

through his Harley Street

practice using the private

London

wHig

At '85 women's conference a resolution calling tor ine natola Labour women's committee hold shadow elections for the women's section of the

the ensuing women's conference (in 1986) was overwhelmingly carried. The women thai women want should not be constrained by artificial party rules or the fact that their faces don't fit with the party establishment.

• For those ready once more for the fight, WAC iS organising at conference

follows: Fringe Meting September,

Bournemouth 6.15-8pm, Pier Centre. Speakers will include

Review 2 OcRichardson

9-12pm, venue HoV Ve The WAC hotel for

sisters wanting advice or a chat is The Cliffside Hotel, Durley Gardens, West Cliff Rouremouth Phone Jane Slowey on 0202 27833.

VOTES TOR

WOMEN

hospital. For a year he did

hold single NHS

LUL

ante-natal clinic, and he

delivers half the number of

oer o oe o los

colleagues do.

HOL Just

medical dispute. Wendy

has touched a raw nerve in

the male-dominated

medical establishment.

She has politically

victimised. The labour

movement should join the

protest against this vicious

suspension.

Picket District Health

Authority, Thursday 12

September 4pm, London

Hospital, Whitechapel.

For more information,

Wendy Savagi

Support Campaign,

Waterloo Road, London

SEI 8XF.

Socialist Action slate for the Labour Party NEC

Labour Campaign

for Lesbian and

Gay rights

debate on lesbian and gay rights almost certain.

Fifty four CLPs and 45 MPs . and MEPs have far signed the LCLGR'S campaign statement calling for such a debate to go ahead

"This debate wIll DE seen bv our members and the lesbian and gay communities as the outcome of man thea overent to

movement Paulane issue, said

Canning the LCLGR.

Pointing out that this was a product of the campaign waged by the lesbian and gay CO IUILl! support of the miners and against the discriminator)

practises of Rugby counci had come up at the TUC for the first time with a SPARE RIB tese probation omficers and resolution submitted supported by NALGO'.

Salisbury CLP has also submitted an amendment Photo Party conference on AIDS the Health debate at

and there will be at least

nine 'out' lesbian and gay

Saturday Panel on Warnock

Speakers include:

Dr Anne McLaren (member of Warnock Inquiry Committee)

Jo Richardson MP Creche, Good disabled access

Street, London WC2B 5AX

13 September 1985 11 Diane Abbott, Westminster City councillor, is on WAC's FOURTEEN constituency Labour Parties have submitted resolutions and amendments to this year's party conference making the first ever conference

delegates attending party conference this year.

Get your CLP/MP/Trade Union branch to support

Lesbians and gay men suffer systematic discrimination TOCICu large and also within the One aspect of this discrimina is highlighted by the fact that annual party conference has never discussed the issue. Another is the fact that the party has a policy which is discrim. inatory (ie different ages of consent for heterosexuals and gay men).

This cannot go on any longer if we are to show to lesbians and gay men that the party has anything to offer them We urge support for the Labour Campaign for Lesbian and Gay Rights campaign to have the issue debated at this year's annual conference. • For more informatior phone 01-326-1471

National Abortion Campaign 10th National Conference Saturday and Sunday 26/27 October 1985 County Hall (GLC) South Bank London

(Waterloo tube)

Sunday Abortion Internationally With speakers on:

Nairobi Decade of Women Conference; Ireland; S Africa; Latin America International attacks

Details from: NAC, Wesley House, 70 Grest Quee

Page 12 scan of this page

BRITAIN NOW stands alone with West Germany in rejecting any sanctions at all against South Africa. The job of the labour movement must be to fight to break all diplomatic, military and economic links with the country until its racist regime fails.

Reagan's patheric 'sanctions' package has

Even the TOocaU-bC.

Daily Telegraph on 10 September explained: •Government, business and anti-apartheid groups were united in their view

Kancal santlbus mould have no practical impacl.

But such cosmetic measures are too much for Geoffrey Howe. The korles three take arguments. against sanc-

They say sanctions will hart black people.

Ine fact that all South African black anti-apartheid organisalions Temand sancuons.

They say they can have

'dialogue' with the regime

:¿torms'. Some dialogue!

Some reforms!

The fact is that they do noi want to kill the goose hat lays their golden eggs.

They do not want the oniy :ust solution: black majority rule.

They say sanctions will nor affect the regime.

Joubts on score hould have been removed • hy the crisis which hit the

RAIES.

Inland 6 months £8, 12 months S15 Overseas

(12 months only)

Europe £17; Air Mail £24 (Double these rates for multi-reader institutions)

Name .

Address

Please send me as special offer .

atited a arenal ee ires Po Bos0

Prizsed By Laneridge Lrd. (TL). London E2.

Break the

Aparthelo

connection

Rand on 31 July.

Business investment does South Africa towards "democracy': it is the önly reason the apartheid regime still exists. South Africa's celiciss. built gold, completely dependent on foreign inwhose profits come from blạck sweat and blood.

Gold brings 40 per cent of South Africa's earnings $7 billion, supplying cent of world per gold.

One measure alone would bring the governitS knees: haclll blanket ban on DalIN loans. According to International Business Week for 9 September South Africa has $12 billion ir short-term loans and can afford to repay only $140 million per month.

The truth is that investors are makıne a tortune out of apartheid.

Tory refusal of sanctions is particularly hypocritical. British banks supply $5.5 billion of South Africa's £12 billion in loans; nearly half South I enclose cheque/PO payable to Socialist Fction for £ . Send to: Socialist Action Subs, PO Box 50, London NI 2XP

50, London N1.

Africa's $11 billion in CHCCLCCRVCSLOICn comes from the 400 UK culDallic. operating LUCIC The UK exports $1.7

billion in goods to South Africa every year.

Collaboration with apartheid is direct. Inter-

Computers Hallolia Limited suppry one utancI of the computer technology that has helper the regime put over 2.800 black leaders in jail. Marconi's have recentiy been revealed io be supplying sanctions-busting military equipnient. hell and RP are up to their necks, not ¡ust in bypassing oil sanctions, but in developing

Mucitdi which, horrifyingly, the inıltarv is considering us

against the black popmlanon

That is why the responsibility falls squarely the shoulders of the labour movement to isolate the racist regime and, together with the massive wave of black resistance which has shown ILS DOWCI world in the last bring down the apartheid government.

The TUC and the Labour Partv must de-

to all links mana an end with South Africa. Bring down the apartheic regime!

Special free book offer!

Take out a years inland subscription and we will send you free one of these books

Over Our Dead Bodies -Women Against the Bomb

Introductory offer for new readers:

Eight issues for just £2!

Base

the fence with countries.

day was clear.

Thi= •Phoenix W'eekend' cincided with the Tory Minist y three r.ihon 'Brave

everele designed i0 faru» public atten-

the nuclear threat towards the supposed Russian threat.

Homen W eTd casily fooled and by Saturday L NEN H OLSICL were evers gale Greenham. gam or Sunday coach loads of

FOR THOSE w ho thought the Greenham Women's Peace Camp was dying last weekend's 'Replace the

action proved them mistaken. Hundreds of women turned up at the 10 different gates to cover

blankets sent from many different

The message from Greenham on its fourth birth-

Greenham is still alive, protesting about the deployment of cruise missiles in Britain.

women started to arrive.

By midday each Di the .! gates had embroideree

By Valerie Coultas

blankets and baner arrayed around them ing that viğilanı abour ithe nudlear anreae aRenasa Paula Yares. trom Yellou Gate. had been strip-searched three WPCS in Newbur! ponce

Greenham lives

station With iwo policem ching they the floor a: internalls

ned D : j W'omen ¿losure.

the cruise have been installalicIlel Greenham has waned. Yet tamen's opposition to the 4 .i." lald has continued

decline -ilic numbers at the camp and a

hard, wet summer The Defence by-lan makin urespass on ine base acıı oftence has increased women's determination 1o invade „ITne camp OUU women had been arrested before the by-law was

-

.manged in April, 1,000 " nie.

Only 75 per cent of the L'S government's planned CLAC. UCCL cone d eruise wat di. The tion by cruisewatch women's peace movement has broadened its aims by taking up the plight of Pacific women islanders protesting at nuclear waste

and Central American momen by plan ning a march againsi US aggression in tha: area

On : Ouoter a camp meting u!! diwuss plans for Desember Make "OLT •Labour altiUl Pariy ur irade union bande s tacre lor enal event.

• For more informatior ielephone London Green. ham Support Group of fice: 01-608 0244.

← Socialist Action No. 112, 6 September 1985Socialist Action No. 114, 20 September 1985 →

Something wrong on this page?