SocialistAction 1983–88

The paper of the Socialist League, formerly the International Marxist Group, 1983–88

CINEMA

Socialist Action No. 127, 17 January 1986 · p. 10 of the scan · 203 words

The scan: 127-jan-17-1986-SA-UK.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 5-5 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 10 of the scan

It has been argued thai the film anticommunist. Putting aside the fact that I don'i believe it is, I would offer one strongly held opinion. That is, simply, in terms of a film's artistic merit, the point of view of the filmmaker is beside the point. The only valid criterion to a creative work is the extent to which it succeeds in capturing aspect reality, without regard to form or 1o the artist's opinion of that reahty.

To insist otherwise: is about films with social themes would lead lo the idea that only Marxists can create such works. I know that's reducing it to the His proverbial absurdity, and that no one would argue the for such a notion, but l do think that is the logic of it.

ommend Kiss of the recommend Spider Woman. I enjoyed vi ded me wily, alod of poro immensely, and it for thought. These days that adds up to a pretty good movie.

Kiss of the Spider Woman, directed by Hector Babenco, stars William Hurt and Paul Julia. It goes on London a release on Thursday 16 January at Screen on the Hill (Haverstock Hill), Gate Cinema (Notting Hill Gate), and Lumiere (Covent Garden).

← Kiss of Spiderwoman: new food for thought.Irish trade unionists reject Accords →

Something wrong on this page?