SocialistAction 1983–88

The paper of the Socialist League, formerly the International Marxist Group, 1983–88

Irish trade unionists reject Accords

Socialist Action No. 127, 17 January 1986 · p. 10 of the scan · 403 words

The scan: 127-jan-17-1986-SA-UK.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 6-7 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 10 of the scan

Independence represents a Accords.

ding negative.

brought under control.

.Without the use of plastic bullets, or money from president of the US and NATO in closer cooperation. and Larkin and internationally, against London and Belfast unionism.' calll soonsored among (Amalgamated 1 UW U).

(Federated Workers Union of Ireland), ana duol (Amalgamated TGWU), Distributive oul workeisi THE TRADE unionists for Irish Unity and (TUIUI) organisation significant body of opinion within the Irish trade union movement. In a statement issued recently they slammed the 'Does this agreement advance the cause of Irish unity?' they asked. And answered with a resoun. In their view, its intention is to create a situation in which the alienation of the North can be deflected addressing the basic problems of supergrass trials, Diplock courts, strip-searching widespread harassment of the nationalist population by the army and police - that is, the problems of partition the disaffection of the minority in the North cannot be overcome. The deal represents, they believe, a repudiation of the New Ireland Forum position for the establishment of a unitary state in TUIUI sees the Anglo-Irish Accords as: 'the culmination of a drift in Irish government policy towards closer political and security cooperation with Britain, the EEC and NATO. The offer of orchestrated support from other American politi cians, the EEC commission and likes of chancellor Kohl, indicate the strategic and military interests Anglo-Irish 'The members of TUIUL. believe in a united Ireland as a necessary step towards achieving a united working class, thereby facilitating the advancement of Irish workers. Our desire to see a united Ireland is hard-headed and practical and is not based on sentiment. We desire a united Ireland so that we can progress towards a 32 County workers' republic, the cherished aim of Connolly 'This agreement will not advance the cause of Irish unity and it must, therefore, be rejected. Instead, the Irish government and those within Ireland who believe in unity, must assert this belief in a positive and vigorous manner and should develop the alliance with progressive forces in Briin a new campaign sp Tsare Unioniss for loish (nily and Independence ss Bonass Gerry remine anonal Penter ad d Deic storse hipers), Eoce coaerin service workers), Eddie ben nearnes John Mitchell (Irist and Administrative workers), Daltur O'Ceallaich (higher eduacation union). Seamus de Paoi (post office engineers), Seamus Redmond (marine and

----- pull-quotes -----

bring your banners and Feb. 1986

← CINEMADefend the surcharge Councillors →

Something wrong on this page?